Answer:
Napoleon took control of the government in a coup d'etat or military takeover. He now had the power to make laws, appoint government ministers and declare war. He ruled as a director from 1799 to 1815.
Explanation:
Napoleon was not king, but his power was absolute, almost in the same way as that of King Louis XVI.
Hello there!
The New Jersey Plan, by definition, was a group of proposals presented by William Patterson of New Jersey to the Constitutional Convention on June 15, 1787. The plan was created in response to the Virginia Plan, which called for two houses of Congress, both elected with apportionment according to population. The New Jersey Plan basically focused on ensuring that small states got an equal share of representation.
Hope I helped!
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
So basically there shall be no slavery within the US, and if there is it will be prosecuted.
The executive power has grown thanks to the social perception of international crisis. Additionally, this has caused the three branches of public power to weaken.
The central theme of the text is the transformation that the central executive power of the United States has had, influenced by different factors such as:
- Indochina War
- Watergate case
These events have caused the presidency of the United States to acquire more power to make decisions. One of the important aspects of this transformation is international politics because the influence of the international crisis made the executive branch grow in importance.
This deepened an internal crisis between the balance of powers, because the executive branch acquired more power in foreign affairs and this situation is being projected onto the national scene of the United States.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/17905949
Note: This question is missing because the text is missing.
In the last years presidential primacy, so indispensable to the political order, has turned into presidential supremacy. The constitutional Presidency—as events so apparently disparate as the Indochina War and the Watergate affair showed, has become the imperial Presidency and threatens to be the revolutionary Presidency. . . . The imperial Presidency was essentially the creation of foreign policy. A combination of doctrines and emotions—belief in the permanent and universal crisis, fear of communism, faith in the duty and right of the United States to intervene swiftly in every part of the world—had brought about the unprecedented centralization of decisions. Prolonged war in Vietnam strengthened the tendencies toward both centralization and exclusion. So the imperial Presidency grew at the expense of the constitutional order. Like the cowbird, it hatched its own eggs and pushed the others out of the nest. And, as it overwhelmed the traditional separation of powers in foreign affairs, it began to aspire toward an equivalent centralization of power in the domestic polity.
Learn more in:
It is the executive privilege that has been interpreted to
mean that a president can shield information from congress as a result of the separation
powers. In the United States, this privilege gives the president and other members
of the executive to refuse subpoenas from the legislative group of the
government to access any information from them. Presidents have the power to
keep confidential information to avoid unnecessary issues that may affect the
government and the country. For example, if there’s an issue with the military
and the president decided to keep this information, then it will be keep.
