Let me say this again

History

1 answer:

serg [7]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Yes, Alberto Fujimori, the former president of Peru.

Explanation:

He ruled from July 28, 1990 until he was impeached in November 22, 2000 after he was accused of embezzlement of government funds, war crimes against the insurgents, and general corruption. After he accusations began to become widespread, he fled Peru and took refuge in Japan. Japan and Peru did not have any extradition treaty. On top of this, he is a Japanese citizen, and it would go against Japanese law to extradict citizens.

Fujimori then resigned over fax, but the Peruvian government didn't accept it, and impeached him. He was extradited back to Peru from Chile in 2007, and convicted. He was pardoned in 2017, but then it got overturned in 2018 and he was ordered to return to prison.

You might be interested in

List three historical issues that have been used to debate the different interpretations of the Constitution. Then choose one of

attashe74 [19]

Brown Vs Board of Education and Roe Vs Wade are good Supreme Court cases that interpreted the Constitution. But a more basic issue was the Bill of Rights which were left out of the Constitution and added later as the first amendments.

The Bills of Rights were important documents protecting rights of people. The founders wanted to put them in the Constitution but there were disagreements on what they should include. Debates dragged on and they needed to pass a Constitution. So the Bills of Rights were left off and added as the first amendments.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What was one religious reform established by Tutankhamun A B C D

jolli1 [7]

What are the answer choices ??

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Do you agree with lincoln’s view of his authority and the way it limited what he could do about slavery?

NNADVOKAT [17]

Yes... I know that slavery was wrong because the white people were just lazy at first. I don't know if it was just because of the heat or what but that was ridiculous using people for hard labor....

6 0

3 years ago

Explain the difference between an executive agreement and a treaty.

Olin [163]

Answer:

A treaty is a formal agreement while an executive agreement is not as formal as a treaty. A treaty is carried on to the successive Presidents while an executive agreement has to be renegotiated every time. An executive agreement is of two types while a treaty is not.

6 0

3 years ago

Match the following: 1. atrocious very poor or terrible conditions 2. exculpatory the act of deliberately making a person angry

seropon [69]

Atrocious-very poor or terrible conditions
exculpatory-a statement or evidence that would prove a person's innocence
miscegenation-marriage between people of different races
provocation-the act of deliberately making a person angry
inculpatory-a statement that incriminates another person

7 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers