Answer:
you can use a poem my friend made to help me also one i found online
Explanation:
I'm a full moon, full plate, full platter.
If you break my heart you stabbed and my blood will splatter.
Like the moon and the stars into your eyes I want to gaze.
Sometimes I used to think love was just a game people played...
thought it was fake, till you took my heart and dipped it in a lake.
Dripping with love, with my emotions please never play.
Will you be with me at night to give me light?
Like the moon, for me, please shine.- By My friend
Something i found
By BaileyClark
“Your skin is not paper, don't cut it. Your face is not a mask, don't hide it. Your size is not a book, don't judge it. Your life is not a film, don't end it.”
The first one.
Explanation:
In this first one, the author is pulling apart what the evidence means (analysing it).
In the 2nd, it is NOT analyzing a piece of evidence specifically, it's summarizes the point and says it's supported by the evidence. So, not analyzing.
In the 3rd, the author is applying it to the situation and explaining why it's important, which is different from analysis.
In the 4th, the author is offering an example as evidence, not analyzing a piece of evidence.
Tevye's analogy is faulty in this situation because "Tevye's analogy is supporting the idea of marrying only Jews; however, it does not explain
the reason why this is supposed to happen".
<h3>How Tevye's analogy is different</h3>
Tevye's analogy is faulty in this situation because it doesn't give reasons to why one is supposed to "seek his own kind".
It is good to seek one's own kind so as to avoid the cultural problem in marriage. It helps to solve the problem of origin differences.
Culture is very important in any relationship. In order not to have different perspectives on an issue, it is ideal to go into relationships with people of the same culture.
Learn more about analogy:
brainly.com/question/13978016
Paragraph 2 contributes to the structure of the interview in that: B. It explains how the setting affected the rescue.
In paragraph 2 of NOAA's Big Miracle Worker, we learn of the interview with the biologist, David Withrow. In paragraph 2 of the interview, Withrow spoke extensively of the weather condition in the area where the rescue was to be made.
The temperature was very low and this drew the interest of a lot of people to the rescue of the whales.
So, paragraph 2 explains how the setting affected the rescue.
Learn more about the setting here:
brainly.com/question/5660357
