William M.Tweed was the leader of Tammany hall
Answer:
No
Explanation:
My personal conclusion to this video would be that No, it would not be worth the sacrifice. Living longer would be great and most of humanity would love that but if it is at the cost of an impoverished biosphere humanity's quality of life will decrease drastically which would not be the way that we imagine when deciding to extend our lives. Instead, we should focus on living our lives to the fullest and trying to find happiness for the short amount of time that we have on this world. The patterns and trends that humans exhibit under such a question in this video can be used to understand what humanity will pursue in the future and what a better world actually looks like.
We have freedom of speech to say what we would like too. But if it degrades out higher power’s then it’s technically against the law. For social justice we can only say proven facts, anything else can we classified as a act of terrorism if we speak out again the government. Exp. Dr. Martin Luther King.
Jefferson's main issue with the federal court system was that it was too powerful, since he favored states' rights over the federal government. Marbury v. Madison fit in because it established "judicial review" which meant the court could deem laws unconstitutional.
