1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
grigory [225]
3 years ago
13

The Teller Amendment stated that _____. the United States could not go to war the United States could not develop colonies the U

nited States could not annex Cuba Spain had no right to mistreat the people of Cuba
History
1 answer:
Alexeev081 [22]3 years ago
8 0

The Teller Amendment stated that <u>the United States could not annex Cuba</u>

Explanation:

The Teller Amendment was an amendment to the resolution from the US Congress. It re-envisaged the US military presence in the state of Cuba and the Cuban Independence. The clause explicitly stated that the US cannot annex Cuba and the US needed to leave the control of Cuba for its natives.

In simple terms, it called for the US aid to Cuba in gaining Independence and after gaining independence the US had to withdraw its boot from the Cuban soil.

You might be interested in
Which best describes General Scott’s actions in the Mexican War?
hammer [34]

The correct answer is C) He had fought several battles and then an armistice halted his movement.

The statement that best describes General Scott’s actions in the Mexican War is "He had fought several battles and then an armistice halted his movement."

During the Mexican-American War, President James K. Polk ordered General Winfield Scott  (1786-1866) to command an army to take the south of Mexico by sea. The order was to capture the port of Veracruz and marched to Mexico City. On March 1847, they marched to Veracruz and in twenty days of armed confrontation, the Mexican Army surrendered and marched to Mexico City where they captured the Chapultepec Castle.

3 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes the significance of suleyman the magnificent
emmainna [20.7K]

Answer:

B. Suleyman the Magnificent led the Ottoman Turks to the height of power

Explanation:

Suleyman the Magnificent is one of the most, if not the most beloved historical figure among the Turkish people. There are numerous reasons for this. Unlike the typical Turkic ruler, Suleyman was very well educated, which led to him making multiple reforms and wise decisions. He prompted cultural development of the empire. Suleyman was a big admirer of the arts, so he lifted the significance of the arts in the society, as well as getting artists to make numerous beautiful things, especially around the capital. He was also a great military tactician, and managed to expand the empire further north in the Balkan Peninsula by defeating the Serbians and capturing Belgrade.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which two phrases best explain major direct results of the fall of the roman empire?
Galina-37 [17]

Answer:

Invasions by Barbarian tribes. The most straightforward theory for Western Rome's collapse pins the fall on a string of military losses sustained against outside forces. Rome had tangled with Germanic tribes for centuries, but by the 300s “barbarian” groups like the Goths had encroached beyond the Empire's borders.

Explanation:

I got you.

7 0
2 years ago
True or False? The terms polyandry and polygyny can be used interchangeably because they mean the same thing
ella [17]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

polygyny means one man married to multiple wives, polygamy is “the practice or condition of having more than one spouse, esp. wife, at one time.”

The opposite of polygamy is monogamy. Poly is the Greek root for “many.” Mono is “one.”

6 0
3 years ago
The 2013 case of Windsor v. United States in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals employed ___ in holding that the Defense of Mar
vova2212 [387]

Thi question is incomplete. Here´s the complete question.

The 2013 case of Windsor v. United States in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals employed ___ in holding that the Defense of Marriage Act held no legitimate state interest and thus overturned it.

Answer: intermediate scrutiny

Explanation:

In United States v. Windsor, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals confirmed the lower court's decision that Section 3 of DOMA was unconstitutional.

The court found that, since homosexuals had been historically subjected to discrimination, they could be considered as a group that falls under a "quasi-suspect classification", and therefore intermediate scrutiny could be applied.

DOMA was deemed unconstitutional under the equal protection guarantees of the Fifth Amendment because it didn´t pass that test.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the importance of Jewish ghettos in Warsaw, Poland during the Holocaust? a. A large concentration camp was formed in Wa
    9·2 answers
  • Compare Pure Marxist with Revisionists.
    7·1 answer
  • What allowed Greek culture to spread across the Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did only some Southerners support Republicans reforms
    9·2 answers
  • How did Kublai Khan organize Mongol rule in China?
    8·2 answers
  • For which of these questions could a testable hypothesis be developed?
    5·2 answers
  • Why is bolivar sometimes called George Washington of south america
    7·1 answer
  • What are the reasons why Canada was created​
    11·1 answer
  • Take a few moments to reflect on what you have learned about the U.S. Constitution. Write a brief reflection about what you cons
    8·1 answer
  • How do state laws influence voter turnout?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!