1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iren [92.7K]
3 years ago
11

The vast majority of Muslims belong to which sect of Islam?

History
1 answer:
erik [133]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Sunni

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why did political leaders blame the Article of Confederation for economic condition?
iragen [17]

Answer:

The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union Is the Answer

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union was an agreement among the 13 original states of the United States of America that served as its first constitution.[1] It was approved, after much debate (between July 1776 and November 1777), by the Second Continental Congress on November 15, 1777, and sent to the states for ratification. The Articles of Confederation came into force on March 1, 1781, after being ratified by all 13 states. A guiding principle of the Articles was to preserve the independence and sovereignty of the states. The weak central government established by the Articles received only those powers which the former colonies had recognized as belonging to king and parliament.[2]

The document provided clearly written rules for how the states' "league of friendship" would be organized. During the ratification process, the Congress looked to the Articles for guidance as it conducted business, directing the war effort, conducting diplomacy with foreign states, addressing territorial issues and dealing with Native American relations. Little changed politically once the Articles of Confederation went into effect, as ratification did little more than legalize what the Continental Congress had been doing. That body was renamed the Congress of the Confederation; but most Americans continued to call it the Continental Congress, since its organization remained the same.[2]

As the Confederation Congress attempted to govern the continually growing American states, delegates discovered that the limitations placed upon the central government rendered it ineffective at doing so. As the government's weaknesses became apparent, especially after Shays' Rebellion, some prominent political thinkers in the fledgling union began asking for changes to the Articles. Their hope was to create a stronger government. Initially, some states met to deal with their trade and economic problems. However, as more states became interested in meeting to change the Articles, a meeting was set in Philadelphia on May 25, 1787. This became the Constitutional Convention. It was quickly agreed that changes would not work, and instead the entire Articles needed to be replaced.[3] On March 4, 1789, the government under the Articles was replaced with the federal government under the Constitution.[4] The new Constitution provided for a much stronger federal government by establishing a chief executive (the President), courts, and taxing powers.

Mark Me As Brainliest Please

6 0
3 years ago
Why was the Monroe Doctrine written?
garri49 [273]

Answer:

The Monroe Doctrine was drafted because the U.S. government was worried that European powers would encroach on the U.S. sphere of influence by carving out colonial territories in the Americas.

Explanation:

(google answer)

please don't :(

It was a protection over the Western Hemisphere. The Monroe Doctrine was basically a foreign policy that couldn't have been sustained in 1823

I really hope this clears everything out.

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is this paragraph true or false?
emmainna [20.7K]
Is true cause the Asia migrate
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Monroe Doctrine (1823) COULD have been used in response to which of these events?
vodomira [7]
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the "invasion of Brazil," since this stated that any further attempts to colonize the Americas would be seen as an act of aggression. </span></span>
4 0
3 years ago
Peoples lives were largely controlled by the companies they worked for. How would buying on credit from a company store contribu
Alchen [17]
“Owe my soul to the company store”

Buying on credit, from employer, means you will likely fall into a cycle of debt to one supplier. Limiting your ability to make purchases from other vendors.

Or to even look for work in another town/move on. Until you pay of your recurring debts, employer effectively owns you!!

Companies in say mining towns, owned or controlled every business from butcher shop, general stores, the bank etc. A monopoly.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is deficit financing
    5·2 answers
  • India’s first great civilization was
    11·2 answers
  • Instructions:Select the correct answer.
    13·1 answer
  • The U.S. wanted Eastern European nations to be under Western control to provide a buffer against Soviet invasions. Please select
    11·1 answer
  • Which term is synonymous with “natural rights,” according to Enlightenment philosophers?
    5·2 answers
  • Which area of government gained the most power under the Gulf of Tonkin resolution?
    10·1 answer
  • What are two american documents that reflect important american values
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following countries would be unlikely to have a large maritime industries?
    9·2 answers
  • What are three ways the Harlem Renaissance impacted African American
    6·2 answers
  • Focus on some of the predictions given in sources 1, 2, and 3. Do you think any of them came true? Fill in
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!