1.Is the author's claim objective? [Topic and Position]
2.From what perspective did the author write the text? [Style]
3.Is the information arranged according to the content, by the author'sargument or by the needs of the audience? [Organization]
4.Which of the references elicits further discussion? [Research/Sources]
5.Where is the text found? [Audience]
6.Does the text mean to persuade? [Purpose/Context]
7.Are the sources credible? [Proof/Evidence]
8.Which of the evidence carries the more weight? [Proof/Evidence]
9.How is the information arranged in the text ? [Organization]
10.What can you infer from the writer's choice of words? [Style]
Answer:
A) Autonomous vehicles may permit drivers to do other things while traveling.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Tell Tale Heart
By: Edgar Allen Poe
Claim: The storyteller believes that he is not crazy although he is.
From the beginning the narrator was attempting to convince the reader that he was not crazy although he was bothered over his neighbors eye. The pace of the story-line began from the narrator admitting how he had a bad feeling whenever the old man's vulture eye looked at the narrator but didn't think that the narrator was crazy over it. Soon enough throughout the story the narrator was driven crazy over the vulture looking eye from the old man and decided to kill the old man. Although from the readers perspective it seems too look like the narrator was crazy, the narrator did not think so. The narrator had planned very meticulously over the thought of killing to old man and acted out on it. Once the deed was done, the police came by to check because a neighbor reported suspicious activity by the old man's home. The narrator let the police in the house to search it and the narrator had explained how the old man was gone to visit a friend out in the country and the police believed him. But the narrator's guilt got to him and put him on edge. He behaved more and more suspicious and finally let a cry out of admitting to killing the man because the narrator thought the policemen were on to him. The way that the mood affected me was that the narrator had begun to admit that he was a normal person, perfectly fine. But once the narrator put out the exposition it started to give out the expression that he was crazy and him denying that he wasn't crazy made the narrator even more suspicious. To conclude my claim, I see that narrator is genuinely crazy and that even though he convinced his own self and attempted to prove the reader he wasn't crazy, in the end he was.
Explanation:
(I'm not sure if it is right but I hope it helps!)
Slaves even had snitches that told on each other so they could get better treatment than some of the slaves. They even had slaves bet other slaves. The slavers were not allowed to read because the slave owners though knowledge could let them know what was going on.
No it does ‘Em! Matter it’s ok to cry and feel your best ok love you dad
