In response to the weakening of the original fugitive slave act, the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 penalized officials who did not arrest an alleged runaway slave, and made them liable to a fine of $1,000 (about $29,000 in present-day value). Law-enforcement officials everywhere were required to arrest people suspected of being a runaway slave on as little as a claimant's sworn testimony of ownership. The suspected slave could not ask for a jury trial or testify on his or her own behalf.[6]<span>In addition, any person aiding a runaway slave by providing food or shelter was subject to six months' imprisonment and a $1,000 fine. Officers who captured a fugitive slave were entitled to a bonus or promotion for their work.
(RUN AWAY SLAVES is the answer)</span>
They believed it to be apposing the teachings of god. This could also be considered as blasphemy against the church. in other words because the theory of evolution rivaled those of the church, therefore church was against the teaching of it. this is because they didn't want people to begin questioning the legitimacy of the church or their teachings.
Hope this helps, i would love a thanks :D
Answer:
The answer is option A: Idealism
Explanation:
I took the test and got this one right :)
They are likely to be biased is the true statement about using secondary sources.
option: A
<u>Explanation:</u>
Secondary sources are considered to be the interpretations and evidence that we get from primary sources. These are basically are not even evidence, these are rather comments and discussion on the evidence on certain concepts or believes. Secondary sources come to picture when it is written after a fact with an advantage of hindsight. Essays on reviews, bibliographies, biographical works, commentaries, criticisms are some of the examples of the secondary sources.