1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nevsk [136]
3 years ago
14

What did Diocletian do in response to the decline of the Roman Empire?

History
1 answer:
marusya05 [52]3 years ago
3 0
The Answer is B
Hope this helped :)
You might be interested in
Making Connections which four of these terms are related to the "great migration" to Oregon?
pentagon [3]

Answer: The four words are Emigrant, Independence, Missouri, Prairie Schooner, and Cayuse.

Explanation:

The Great Migration started in 1916 and didn't end until 1970. This was when the African American citizens moved from the Southern states they lived in to the West, Midwest, and the Northeast regions of the United States.

All of the words listed above are related to the Great Migration. In the early days, they rode in prairie schooners to get to their destination.  The Cayuse were resentful of the new settlers and this caused issues at some times during their passage.

5 0
3 years ago
What is the geographical significance of dutch empire during WWI
lord [1]

The Dutch colonial empire (Dutch: Nederlandse koloniale rijk) comprised the overseas territories and trading posts controlled and administered by Dutch chartered companies—mainly the Dutch West India Company and the Dutch East India Company—and subsequently by the Dutch Republic (1581–1795), and by the modern Kingdom of the Netherlands after 1815.[1] It was initially a trade-based system which derived most of its influence from merchant enterprise and from Dutch control of international maritime shipping routes through strategically placed outposts, rather than from expansive territorial ventures.[2][1] The Dutch were among the earliest empire-builders of Europe, following Spain and Portugal.

5 0
3 years ago
The video you just watched revolved around a poet's interpretation of the moment Julius Caesar chose to cross the Rubicon River.
stellarik [79]

Alea iacta est ("The die is cast") is a variation of a Latin phrase (iacta alea est)  attributed by Suetonius to Julius Caesar who pronounced it in the year 49 B.C. when he was leading his army across the Rubicon river in the current territories of Northern Italy. Subsequently, he entered in Italy heading his army and defying the Roman Senate and it meant the beginning of the civil war versus Pompey and the Optimates.

  • Plutarch, referred to the same event in his written testimonies and reported the phrase but stating it was pronounced in Greek instead of Latin and that its translation meant: <em>'Let the die be cast'.</em>
  • Suetonius described the same situation, reporting a very similar phrase but not exactly the same. Let's include the exact excerpt of his writings where he did so.

<em>Caesar: '... iacta alea est,' inquit.</em>

<em>Caesar said, "The die has been cast."</em>

Thefore there are two very similar versions of the same historical events. Usually the Latin version is the most widely known, as the Latin language was more widespread all over Europe and gave rise to all the current family of Latin languages (Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese, etc).


3 0
3 years ago
How do you think native Americans viewed the idea of manifest destiny
stich3 [128]
At first the Native American's were fine to share their land with the colonist, but it be came more clear that the colonist were starting to push the Native Americans out of their land. So how do the Native Americans think about Manifest Destiny they see it as invasive and intrusive movement that was being done by the colonist and were more than willing to go to war for their land.
7 0
4 years ago
Which BEST describes a result of the Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott case?
Lyrx [107]

The correct answer is C) A slave was not a citizen but rather the property of an owner.

The Dred Scott vs. Sandford case revolved around the claims of Dred Scott, a black man who was a slave. This man argued that he should be free, as his owner brought him into the Illnois territory were slavery was prohibited. Essentially, Scott argued that his living in this territory should make him free.

However, the Supreme Court ruled against Scott. The majority opinion discussed how slaves are property and that they have no rights in which white men need to respect. This controversial case caused a huge division in American society.

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the capital of Africa ????
    5·2 answers
  • How was ratification of the new constitution made easier?
    8·1 answer
  • 1. What attracted Romans to Christianity?
    9·2 answers
  • How can real life examples support a strong argument
    11·1 answer
  • Prehistory can be described as _____
    15·1 answer
  • In the
    11·2 answers
  • Many believe the U.S. Constitution was made to be slow and time consuming. If this is true, why would the founding fathers have
    6·2 answers
  • In a paragraph explain the role of the people in John Locke’s society
    14·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!
    7·2 answers
  • The government of the Roman Republic had a system of checks and balances to
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!