1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
amid [387]
3 years ago
10

When a famous painting becomes available for sale, it is often known which museum or collector will be the likely winner. Yet, t

he auctioneer actively woos representatives of other museums that have no chance of winning to attend anyway.
Suppose a piece of art has recently become available for sale and will be auctioned off to the highest bidder, with the winner paying an amount equal to the second highest bid. Assume that most collectors know that Janet places a value of $125,000 on the art piece and that she values this art piece more than any other collector. Suppose that if no one else shows up, Janet simply bids $125,000/2 = $5,000 and wins the piece of art.

The expected price paid by Kenji, with no other bidders present, is $:_________
Suppose the owner Of the artwork manages to recruit another bidder, Manuel, to the auction. Manuel is known to value the art piece at $8,000.
The expected price paid by Kenji, given the presence of the second bidder Manuel, is $:_________

Business
1 answer:
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]3 years ago
5 0

Please find attached

Answer and Explanation:

1. If there are no other bidders present as from question them we can conclude that Kenji would buy the art piece for $5000. See question

2. If there is a bidder present in the name of Manuel who would bid for $8000 then Kenji would bid at $8000 and win the bid for the art piece. See question. Kenji would bid at price of 2nd highest bidder to win the bid for art piece

You might be interested in
Q 17.1: ________ is not considered a step in activity-based costing.
Ierofanga [76]
Identifying a single overhead rate as the predetermined overhead rate (b)
3 0
4 years ago
On January 1, 2019, Wildhorse Co. issued $379,500, 7%, 5-year bonds at face value. Interest is payable annually on January 1. (a
nikklg [1K]

Answer:

See the explanation for the answer.

Explanation:

(a)

Bonds are issued at face value

date                   Account                          debit                 credit

Jan 1 ,2019       cash                               $379,500  

                        bonds payable                                        $379,500

                        [to record cash received

                        against bonds issued]  

b.

Interest accrued from Jan-Dec = $379,500*7% = $26,565

                                    Account  

Dec 31 ,2019          Interest expense              $26,565  

                              Interest payable on bonds                 $26,565

As interest is accrued it will be expensed

.

However, it is not paid so it will be interest payable

c)  Interest paid

                                                                       Debit               Credit

Jan 1 ,2020  Interest payable on bonds    $26,565  

                       Cash                                                            $26,565

8 0
3 years ago
True or False: This fact violates the efficient markets hypothesis because the efficient markets hypothesis argues that it is im
Deffense [45]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

It is true that this fact violates the efficient markets hypothesis because the efficient markets hypothesis argues that it is impossible to earn above-market returns.

Efficient market hypothesis holds that asset prices reflect all available information. A direct implication is that <u>it is impossible to "beat the market" </u>consistently on a risk-adjusted basis since market prices should only react to new information.

Hence since it is impossible to beat the market, it is impossible to earn above-market returns.

8 0
3 years ago
Ernest Burns, Orlando summemour, and randy Hatcher formed swi Partners, a general partner- ship. J. t. turner Construction Compa
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

Summemour and Hatcher WERE JOINTLY and SEVERALLY LIABLE

Explanation:

What is Partnership

Partnership is a form of business, where individuals come together to carry on business with the primary intention of making profit. Mostly, they come together by contributing capital and expertise to make the business work . Every partner is however liable and responsible for both the profit made and the losses or liabilities of the partnership.

Although the general partner has unlimited liability, every partner is however jointly and severely liable for the business

Were Summemour and Hatcher Liable?

This case is referred in the J.T. Turner Construction Company v. Summerour and Hatcher(2009). The court this case declared that both Hatcher and Summemour were jointly and severally liable as a result of the following reasons.

A partner becomes liable especially for a prior judgment based on the following

1. The partnership has proven indebtedness

2. A general partner in the partnership was sued to court

Based on these, Summemour and Hatcher WERE JOINTLY and SEVERALLY LIABLE

6 0
3 years ago
Lindsay took out a(n) to purchase her new home. she used in the form of the property to back the loan. lindsay also paid money i
Andre45 [30]

The bank will most likely be filled with the following:

  • Mortgage loan
  • Collateral
  • Down payment
  • Seize her home.

<h3>What is a loan?</h3>

A loan is a sum of money, borrowed from a financial institution usually a bank or credit union to meet certain obligations.

The following statement should be considered:

  1. Lindsay took out a Mortgage Loan to purchase her new home.
  2. She used collateral in the form of the property to back the loan.
  3. Lindsay also paid money in advance. This is known as a Down payment.
  4. If Lindsay does not make her loan payments on time, the bank will most likely seize her home.

Learn more about loan here : brainly.com/question/12481147

Hence, the bank will most likely be filled with Mortgage loan, collateral, Down payment, seize her home.

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Wyly Inc. produces and sells a single product?
    7·1 answer
  • Ivanhoe Company purchased a new machine on October 1, 2017, at a cost of $77,980. The company estimated that the machine has a s
    7·2 answers
  • An example of the U.S. Constitution's "full faith and credit clause" is that a person with a driver's license from the state of
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following variables would be "X" in a short term aggregate supply curve?
    8·1 answer
  • The HIM director hired an HIM data integrity analyst. This is a new position with a newly created job description. The director
    6·1 answer
  • Impact of false colleges on learners , parents and the country
    13·1 answer
  • A go-cart manufacturer recently added shock absorbers to make the ride in its go-carts smoother. it has not changed its prices.
    6·2 answers
  • A stock has an expected return of 10.2 percent, the risk-free rate is 3.9 percent, and the market risk premium is 7.2 percent. W
    5·1 answer
  • Use the following information for Taco Swell, Inc., (assume the tax rate is 21 percent): 2017 2018 Sales $ 16,549 $ 18,498 Depre
    12·1 answer
  • Poppy co. uses a periodic inventory system. beginning inventory on january 1 was understated by $30,000, and its ending inventor
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!