Answer: (e.) The same pay as either a professor or as a chief economist at the Humane Society.
Explanation:
The correct answer would be <u>option (e)</u> because in this case there lies an ambiguity i.e. we are uncertain about skillets that an economists should be endowed with or for being a faculty member.
Therefore , it can be concluded that he would get at least as good pay as being faculty. In both cases he'll be better off.
Answer:
33.33%
Explanation:
Let weight of T-bill be x, therefore weight of stock will be 1-x
Portfolio = Weight of stock*Beta of stock + Weight of T-bills*Beta of T-bills
1 = (1-x)*1.5 + x*0
1 = 1.5 - 1.5x
x = 0.5/1.5
x = 0.3333
x = 33.33%
Therefore, the percentage of the portfolio invested in treasury bills is 33.33%.
According to Quora dot com, US magazines are viewed as historically dependent on advertising revenue hence why subscriptions to magazines are historically very low as advertising is used to subsidise cover price or subscription cost.
With the general collapse of print publications in the US, particularly led by the drying up of physical newsstand presence, magazines have a harder time getting into consumer's hands. This means that advertisers are less likely to spend in a publication (readership decreasing) and then advertising revenues go down, making magazines less and less profitable.
I realize this is quit lengthy so I'd sum it up to saying the business model for magazines has traditionally been the selling of advertising space ... Not sure if this is what you're looking for
