1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nikklg [1K]
3 years ago
10

"Some business and political leaders argue that offshoring is dangerous because it can move jobs from developed countries to les

s-developed countries. Others argue that although offshoring might displace workers in the short run, in the longer term, everyone benefits by having developing economies create new industries, products, and markets for products and services that create high-level service and managerial jobs in the developed world. In recent years, some economists have argued that offshoring today is having a negative impact on service and professional employment in highly developed countries.
Using resources in your library or online, write about 100 words in which you present two arguments for and two arguments against a U.S. company offshoring the management of its customer relationships to technical and managerial personnel in a less-developed country."
Business
1 answer:
vladimir2022 [97]3 years ago
8 0

Answer and Explanation:

Arguments for U.S. Company offshoring:

1. Cost savings:

Companies usually offshore manufacturing or services to developing countries where wages are low, thus resulting in cost savings. These savings are passed on to the customers, shareholders and managers of these companies.

2. Skills:

The competitive advantage of nations often means that some countries or regions develop a much better ecosystem for certain types of industries. This means there is better availability of skilled human resources in that region for specific types of tasks. For example, India and the Philippines have a large pool of English-speaking, college educated youth; as well as a mature training infrastructure; that makes it ideal for business process outsourcing. Therefore, many companies choose to offshore certain business functions (e.g. call centers for customer support) to these locations.

Arguments for U.S. Company offshoring:

1. Quality Control:

While companies can set quality standards for work performed by foreign employees, language and cultural barriers, as well as overseas supply chains, can present barriers to quality control. Products made overseas can be flawed because of out-of-date or worn equipment in overseas factories, or substandard raw materials. In 2000, for example, Masterlock had to recall more than 750,000 locks made in China. Worn dies at the Chinese factory produced locks that could be pulled apart without a key.

2. Public Image:

In times of high unemployment in the United States, sending jobs out of the country can hurt a company’s public image. Fewer regulations in other countries can make it less expensive for American factories to operate, but environmental damage and labor abuses that make the news can tarnish the image of companies involved there. Consumers have organized boycotts against companies that use child labor or sweatshops to produce clothing and shoes. In response, companies such as Nike, Dell and Gap have established codes of conduct for their suppliers.

You might be interested in
In a business combination in which an acquiring company purchases 100% of the outstanding common stock of another company, if th
spin [16.1K]

Answer:

It will be reported as gain.

Explanation:

If the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired exceeds the fair value of the consideration given (purchase cost) will be a <u>negative goodwill.</u>

It will be due to <em>"bargain purchase"</em> and the accounting records the "negative goodwill" as a gain in the income statment

4 0
3 years ago
A lottery winner can take $6 million now or be paid $600,000 at the end of each of the next 16 years. The winner calculates the
Semmy [17]

Answer:

Yes, her decision was correct because of Net present value rule.

Explanation:

the net present value (NPV) applies to a series of cash flows occurring at different times.

The present value of a cash flow depends on the interval of time between now and the cash flow. It also depends on the discount rate. NPV accounts for the time value of money. It provides a method for evaluating and comparing capital projects or financial products with cash flows spread over time, as in loans, investments, payouts from insurance contracts plus many other applications.

Time value of money dictates that time affects the value of cash flows.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to the FASB's conceptual framework, the quality of information that helps users increase the likelihood of correctly f
Kisachek [45]

Answer:

C. Predictive value.

Explanation:

Relevant information is able to make a difference in user decisions. To do so, it must have predictive value, confirmatory value, or both. Financial information has predictive value if it can be used as an input in a predictive process.

4 0
3 years ago
The stock in Up-Towne Movers is selling for $48.20 per share. Investors have a required return of 11.2 percent and expect the di
Keith_Richards [23]

Answer:

The dividend the company just paid is $3.53

Explanation:

The solution to the problem is given as follows.

$48.20 = D1/(.1120 − .0360)

$48.20= D1(0.076)

Making D1 the subject of formula we have.

D1 = $3.66

D0 = $3.66/(1 + .0360)

D0 = $3.53

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In a portfolio of three randomly selected stocks, which of the following could NOT be true; i.e., which statement is false?
Tpy6a [65]

Answer: b. The beta of the portfolio is higher than the highest of the three betas

Explanation:

The beta of a portfolio is calculated as a weighted average of the individual betas of the individual stocks. As such, the highest individual beta will be the upper limit of the portfolios entire beta.

For instance.

3 stocks A, B and C have betas of 1, 1.3 and 2 respectively.

A has a weight of 1%, B has a weight of 1% and C has a weight of 98%.

The portfolio beta will be;

= (0.01 * 1 ) + ( 0.01 * 1.3) + ( 0.98 * 2)

= 1.98

Even if the stock with the highest beta had an advantage of weighing such a high figure, it it mathematically impossible for the portfolio beta to be higher than it.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Thalassines Kataskeves, S.A., of Greece makes marine equipment. The company has been experiencing losses on its bilge pump produ
    13·1 answer
  • Direct finance is a transaction between two parties where one party lends directly to the other​ party, whereas indirect finance
    10·1 answer
  • Martin Buber Co. purchased land as a factory site for $400,000. The process of tearing down two old buildings on the site and co
    15·1 answer
  • Ross Electronics has one product in its ending inventory. Per unit data consist of the following: cost, $26; selling price, $36;
    6·1 answer
  • A farmer believes that his new irrigation method would result in more crop yield than the old one. To test his theory, he applie
    8·2 answers
  • Homer notices that he gains more weight if he eats more doughnuts. Fill in the blanks to com the passage about the correlation b
    9·1 answer
  • The cost of perpetual preferred stock is found as the preferred's annual dividend divided by the market price of the preferred s
    12·1 answer
  • Adam kisses the sleeve of Eve’s blouse, an act to which she did not consent. Has Adam committed a tort and if so, which one? Exp
    6·1 answer
  • When the price of paintings is set at $500, the local art gallery supplies 20 paintings per week. When the price of paintings in
    7·1 answer
  • Information ads help supply _?_that help you learn about and compare products and services.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!