1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lilit [14]
3 years ago
5

Who came up with the idea of popular sovereignty and what did that concept mean?

History
2 answers:
SIZIF [17.4K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Benjamin Franklin expressed his idea of sovereignty. Sovereignty is the principle that the authority of a state and its government are created and sustained by the consent of its people, through their elected representatives (Rule by the People), who are the source of all political power.

Explanation:

Sveta_85 [38]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Lewis Cass of Michigan, who was a Democratic candidate for President in the election of 1848, coined the term "popular sovereignty." The idea of" popular sovereignty" was whether or not slavery would exist there.

Explanation:

Lewis Cass came up with the term and the idea was about slavery.

I hope this helps let me know if im right :D

You might be interested in
What are the states obligations to each other?
steposvetlana [31]
Article IV of the Constitution requires that states give full faith and credit to the public acts, records, and civil judicial proceedings of every other state. So, payments can cross state lines. For example, marriage licenses, driver's licenses, and debts work in every state.
6 0
3 years ago
Think about what you know about the Espionage and Sedition Acts. Now apply that to some real-world situations. Check any action
leva [86]
The following statements would result in the application of the Espionage and Sedition Acts: 

1) A person says that the government made a mistake by getting involved in the war.

2) A speaker suggests that people should stop work to protest the war.

3) A labor union holds a strike at a munitions factory.

Both of these statements would result in punishments according to the Espionage and Sedition Acts (passed in 1918, during World War I). These acts made any speech that was considered critical of the government or disloyal to the US illegal. Along with this, anyone who interfered with the war effort could be punished. This is why the statements above would be real world situations of the Espionage and Sedition Acts.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Need help please
Andrei [34K]

1.What was causing people to leave Sandwich?

- Due to the Black Plague an extremely devastating pandemic of Bubonic plague that was peaking during the exact same era throughout all of Europe. The mortality rate was extremely high and it would end up killing a third of the population of Europe.

2. What are the two reasons listed in the document that explain why the government would want to keep the people in the town?

- The first is to avoid the spreading of the disease by the migration of infected individuals and/or groups. The second is to avoid the flight of capital and or people who were needed by the English realm in order to properly function.

3. Make a reasonable conclusion based on your knowledge from this unit and the reading and explain: What would be the long-term economic and social effects on Sandwich and England if people were allowed to leave?

- Had all people been allowed to leave, the whole town would have been deserted, probably never to be inhabited again. A good portion of its inhabitants might have fled to other parts of England, worsening the pandemic and the others would have gone to the France, were England was waging the Hundred Years’ War against the French. Since many of these people might have been infected, their presence in the English-controlled parts of France might worsen the already damaging pandemic and weaken the English war effort. For England the effect would have been overall destructive due to these reasons.


3 0
3 years ago
22. Describe the significance of the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison:​
tresset_1 [31]

Explanation:

Why is Marbury v. Madison important?

  1. Marbury v. Madison is important because it established the power of judicial review for the U.S. supreme court and lower federal courts with respect to state courts with respect to state constitution
8 0
3 years ago
Who built the first plane
Whitepunk [10]
Wilbur and Orville Wright
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • After a bill has been introduced, what happens next?
    12·2 answers
  • In the case, the Supreme Court ruled that due process:
    5·2 answers
  • Cual es la capital de honduras ?
    9·1 answer
  • How did the Black Death affect medieval Europe?
    8·1 answer
  • What did the sadducees and the pharisees have in common?
    7·2 answers
  • What regions is Hinduism still practiced today? How many people still practice it today?
    9·2 answers
  • If most of the population growth in the future is expected to take place in developing countries, predict what effects this will
    7·1 answer
  • Victory at what battle during this war, solidified help from abroad
    9·1 answer
  • Need answered asap
    9·1 answer
  • 7. Looking at Map #1 and #2, how did the Roman civilization change between 500 BCE and 200 BCE? ​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!