1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mario62 [17]
3 years ago
13

Which one of the following was not a restriction placed on slaves under the slave codes passed by slave states? A. Slaves were n

ot allowed to learn to read or write. B. Slaves were not allowed to meet in groups. C. Slaves were not allowed to work in the fields more than eight hours a day. D. Slaves were not allowed to buy or sell goods.
History
1 answer:
hodyreva [135]3 years ago
4 0

A. Slaves were not allowed t read and write.

You might be interested in
The railroad system lead to the creation of ___________ in America.
Arturiano [62]
Time zones so the answer is a
5 0
3 years ago
Help help help history history ASAP
netineya [11]

Answer:

Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated

4 0
2 years ago
What did the national government lack under the articles of confederation?
TiliK225 [7]
The Articles of Confederation<span> created a </span>national government<span> composed of a Congress, which had the power to declare war, appoint military officers, sign treaties, make alliances, appoint foreign ambassadors, and manage relations with Indians.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
What city state domoinated over many city states afte the persian wars?
Aloiza [94]
Athens, Sparta, or Macedonia was three of the larger city states that ruled almost anything it touched.<span />
8 0
3 years ago
Did the Native Americans believe that acquiring possessions was an important goal?
ohaa [14]

Answer:

Explanation:At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How much did bill clinton help native american?
    15·1 answer
  • What are the main points of the Virginia plan?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a cause of the Ottoman empire s decline?
    12·1 answer
  • The civil war began because
    10·1 answer
  • How is the geography of the Mayan civilization different from the geography of the Mesopotamian civilization?
    7·1 answer
  • History Question
    7·1 answer
  • How does the image of buddha tend to vary from statue to statue?
    12·2 answers
  • In your opinion, is it fair for one country to come into another and take their resources in
    13·1 answer
  • How did the blitz differ from world war 1 bombings
    11·1 answer
  • During Reconstruction, white supremacists in the South targeted
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!