Answer:
st j yd 2nd d b h us s 2nd e hu 7bफ लठ चन ऑवy if kuch dhf
The answer is primitive, since medical practices were not nearly as advanced as they are today.
Answer:
Two states that gained electoral votes from the 2008 presidential election to the 2012 election:
- Texas 34 Electoral votes in 2008, 38 EV in 2012
- Texas pop in 2000: 28.8 million. Texas pop in 2010: 25.1 million.
- Florida 27 EV in 2008, 29 EV in 2012
- Florida pop in 2000: 15.9 million. Florida pop in 2010: 18.8 million
Two states that lost electoral votes:
- New York 31 Electoral votes in 2008, 29 EV in 2012
- New York pop in 2000: 18,9 million. New York pop in 2010: 19,3 million
- Michigan 17 EV in 2008, 16 EV in 2012
- Michigan pop in 2000: 9,9 million. Michigan pop in 2010: 9,8 million.
Explanation:
Texas and Florida gained 4 and 2 electoral votes respectively because their populations grew around 20%.
New York and Michigan both lost 2 and 1 electoral votes respectively. In the case of New York, there was not a loss in population, but very littel increase, and this made New York lose population size as percentage of the total population of the US. In the case of Michigan, the loss of one electoral vote corresponded with a population loss of around 100,000 people.
Bruh, lol... you serious?
F
O
F
O
F
O
F
F
F
O
F
F
O
O
Bartolome De Las Casas expected the Spaniards to convert the native population to Christianity through civil means. Instead, they forced conversion on these people and used violence if individuals resisted this change in religion. De Las Casas was appauled by the efforts of the Spanish and described the brutal treatment that Spanish conquerors used against Native American populations. He recorded his observations in his book <em>The Destruction of the Indies. </em>This would become one of the most famous books about Spanish colonization during the 16th century.
