Answer:
The total turnover increases
Explanation:
Asset Turnover Ratio is a measure of how efficient the assets of a company is when compared with the company's sales or revenue. To calculate Asset turnover ration, the<u> net sales is set as a percentage of the company's total assets. </u>
The higher the turnover of the asset based on the calculation then the higher the chances that organisation is generating revenue efficiently from its assets. A lower turnover however is the implication that the company is not efficiently using its assets and it could imply some internal issues.
Therefore, the higher the sales without any change in assets means the Asset Turnover will increase or be higher and it will indicate higher efficiency
Answer:
the Cash outflows for rent in Year 2 is $253,000
Explanation:
The computation of the Cash outflows for rent in Year 2 is shown below:
Prepaid rent at year 2 $88,000
Add: rent expense $244,000
Less: prepaid rent in year 1 -$79,000
Cash outflows for rent in year 2 $253,000
Hence, the Cash outflows for rent in Year 2 is $253,000
Answer:
I can't post the link i found to answer the question so if u look this up u will find the answer
Explanation:
Is the monetary costs a firm pays out and the revenue a firm receives. It is the bookkeeping profit<span>, and it is higher than economic </span>profit<span>. </span>Accounting profit<span> = total monetary revenue- total costs.</span>
Answer:
The defense was not valid as per court.
Explanation:
The Indiana requirement of having license before initiating a credit business is to be fulfilled before starting the transactions and according to the customs when starting such business, a research is properly done to avoid any future claims and get firsthand knowledge of business initiation process.
Flinn’s statement to be unaware of the fact that it is necessary to get license, and non-criminal intentions are not justifiable as per the law because law is more of explicit things rather than implicit, i.e. acts and intentions, respectively.
So, the defense is not justifiable.