According to brutus, A confederation of small republics is more likely to preserve and protect personal liberties, because as the people are the sovereign, and their sentiments are communicated by themselves which is why it must be limited so that the people can conveniently assemble and debate.
- The large republics could cancel out the voices of the people and states and the authority of the states, because they are bigger in size and could gain more power and could infringe on state sovereignty, which would infringe on the peoples' liberties
Brutus favors a true confederation, which would be: a number of independent states entering , for conducting certain general concerns, in which they have a common interest, leaving the management of their internal and local affairs to go and their separate governments.
to know more about republic click here
brainly.com/question/15340060
#SPJ4
The constitution is, as the declaration of independence was a document to tell England that the america's were no longer under british rule. i hope this helps!
Providing harsh criticism to other players is a natural part of being a good leader - this is true. The reason for this is that good leaders will often be able to accept a harsh critique coming their way and also be able to give a harsh critique which a player deserves.
In both the Democratic and Republican parties, a committee decides on the place and date of the national convention.
The Democratic-Republican Party was an American political gathering, shaped by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in 1791–93 to restrict the bringing together strategies of the new Federalist Party keep running by Alexander Hamilton, who was then Secretary of the Treasury and boss designer of George Washington's organization.
