Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
When supply is perfectly inelastic, the supply curve is vertical as shown in the attached plot. Thus, the tax that shifts the supply curve upward would have no effect on the equilibrium quantity or price paid by consumers. Since equilibrium quantity or price paid by consumer don't change there's no burden on them. However, no team's owners would receive a lower after tax price and thus bearing the entire tax burden.
Answer:
$ 226.04
Explanation:
Given:
Paying fund, FV = $ 30000
Interest rate, i = 2%
Time, t = 10 years
Now,
![\textup{PMT}=\textup{FV}[\frac{i}{(1+i)^n-1}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctextup%7BPMT%7D%3D%5Ctextup%7BFV%7D%5B%5Cfrac%7Bi%7D%7B%281%2Bi%29%5En-1%7D%5D)
since, the payment is made monthly
thus,
n = 10 × 12 = 120 months
i = 2% / 12 = 0.02 / 12
on substituting the values in the above equation, we get
![PMT={30000}[\frac{\frac{0.02}{12}}{(1+{\frac{0.02}{12}})^{120}-1}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=PMT%3D%7B30000%7D%5B%5Cfrac%7B%5Cfrac%7B0.02%7D%7B12%7D%7D%7B%281%2B%7B%5Cfrac%7B0.02%7D%7B12%7D%7D%29%5E%7B120%7D-1%7D%5D)
or
PMT = $ 226.04
Answer:
The correct answer is A) $2.800
Explanation:
Using the straight-line method to depreciate, the calculation to find the depreciation tax shield is the following:
- Finding the depreciable cost:
- Finding the depreciation per year:
- Finally, the depreciation tax shield for 2018:
Answer: $0
Explanation:
Layla qualifies for $8,000 in housing credits.
These are withdrawn at $500 for every $1,000 she earns above the wage limit of $26,500
Layla's annual income = 35,000 + 7,500
= $42,500
Amount earned above limit = 42,500 - 26,500
= $16,000
Amount of housing credit withdrawn is $500 per thousand so for $16,000, $8,000 will be withdrawn from her housing credit.
Housing credit = 8,000 - 8,000
= $0
Answer:
East Asia's accomplishment in accomplishing a high development rate is a miracle.The example of overcoming adversity centers around outside trade,savings of government and above all in teaching young men and young ladies so that by accomplishing high education level they can accomplish high financial growth.East Asia likewise have a high PPP(Purchasing Power Parity)which helped them to accomplish high growth.Countries like China and Japan are putting more in colleges.
Fare - situated methodology assumes a significant job being developed of East Asia.Many nations like Japan,Taiwan,China moved to send out polocies to cultivate high econmic growth.Of course,open exchange will be a significant development driven motor and the creating nations will considered it as a most significant weapon in accomplishing growth.Thus,industrialisation is a significant rebound for East Asia to accomplish high financial development.
Therefore,industralisation,openness to trade,educational accomplishment and import-send out approaches helped East Asia to accomplish high econmic development.
(b)We know the idea of 'theory of unavoidable losses or Total Factor Productivity.It states that at one point including one extra factor of creation brings about a lessening increment in output.For example,if we utilize laborers to fabricate an item then at a specific level the creation is steady and by utilizing more,the yield decreases.So we can say that the given articulation is valid.
TFP is a significant factor for high development rate.East Asian nations have accomplished a high growth.Most of this is from factor accumulation.East Asia TFP can't and along these lines the nations lost their normal development achievement.High monetary development brings about low TFP.
