Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Explanation
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer and Explanation:
Income statement-Partial
Income from operation 6545600
Other revenue & gains
Interest revenue 17250
6562850
other expenses & losses
Loss due to volcano 787700
Impairment loss 49730
Income before income tax 5725420
income tax 1717626
Net income /loss 4007794
Per share common stock
Net income /loss 0.81
Earning per share
Earning per share common stock
Income from operation(6545600/4936300) 1.33
Non operating income
interest revenue (17250/4936300) 0.003
Income before extraordinary items 1.33
extraordinary loss
(787700+49730)/4936300 -0.17
Income tax expenses (1717626/4936300) -0.35
Net income 0.81
The statement, according to the erosion model of an organizational commitment, the employee with the fewest emotional bonds is the most likely to quit, is true.
The erosion model explains that an organization's employee who have less or fewer emotional bonds tend to quit the organization because they do not feel or get involved in the organization, or they don't feel any attachment to it.
Here the social influence model states that suppose when two employees are closely related or have good terms, so if one of them quits their work, then the other one is more likely to follow them and leave the organization.
Hence, the erosion model suggests that employees with fewer bonds will be most likely to quit the organization.
To learn more about erosion model here:
brainly.com/question/28444776
#SPJ4
Answer:
$2,133,136.53
Explanation:
Calculation for value of the levered firm
First step is to calculate the VU
VU= [$489,602 × (1 - .35)] / .167
VU= $1,905,636.53
Now let calculate the value of the levered firm
VL= $1,905,636.53 + .35($650,000)
VL= $2,133,136.53
Therefore the value of the levered firm is $2,133,136.53
Answer:
Foster an innovative culture and climate that permits experimentation, risk-taking , and failure.
Explanation:
The director of the new product development in the given case comes across that even after the proper research done by his team regarding the product acceptance by the consumers the outcome was not the same.
In order to keep his team open to innovation the director Rinn should encourage and develop an environment of creating new ideas and products which should open up the scope for experiments , risks and failure of the product keeping in mind that all experiments does not necessarily leads to positive results and involves risks as well.