Answer:
We can assume that Sparks Corporation is going to pay preferred stockholders first:
preferred stock dividends = $100 x 8% x 3,000 = $24,000
If the corporation doesn't owe any previous dividends to preferred stockholders, then the remaining $81,000 (= $105,000 - $24,000) should be distributed to common stockholders.
Each preferred stock will receive a $8 dividend. I don't know the amount of outstanding common stock, so it is not possible to determine how much dividend will be distributed for each common stock outstanding.
Answer:
$57,600
Explanation:
The computation of the total amount paid to preferred shareholders are shown below:
= Number of shares for preferred stock × par value × dividend rate × number of years
= 1,200 shares × $100 × 12% × 4 years
= $57,600
In case of cumulative, the number of years would be four years for dividend paid
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
Answer:
The correct answer is Dell will offer $20 per copy of the software and Symantec will accept the offer.
Explanation:
A Nash equilibrium is a situation in which all players have put into practice, and know that they have done so, a strategy that maximizes their earnings given the strategies of others. Consequently, no player has any incentive to individually modify their strategy.
It is important to keep in mind that a Nash equilibrium does not imply that the best joint result for the participants is achieved, but only the best result for each of them considered individually. It is perfectly possible that the result would be better for everyone if, in some way, the players coordinated their action.
In economic terms, it is a kind of imperfect balance of competition that describes the situation of several companies competing for the market of the same good and who can choose how much to produce to try to maximize their profit.
Answer:
D. Has not committed an unethical act since the loan was documented in writing.
Explanation:
Section 102 of the Uniform Securities Act of 1956 specifies that it is unlawful and unethical for an investment adviser representative to enter into a contract with a client except it is provided in writing that he does not stand to gain any financial profit, that no assignment of the contract would be made without the consent of the other party, and that if there is any change in the membership of the contract, the other party would be notified.
So, if the contract was documented between the investment adviser and the client, then it would not be unethical conduct.
Based on business sales strategy, marketing intermediaries add <u>time utility</u> to products by having them available when consumers want them.
This is because the <u>time utility</u> allows the business firms and marketers to make the products available to the consumers whenever they need them.
<u>Time utility</u> is a marketing tool used by the business firms like retails to add value to products and to bridge the gap between the products and consumers.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>time utility</u>."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/12514869
