1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Firlakuza [10]
3 years ago
5

Type your response in the box. Now that you've read an excerpt of the “Checkers Speech” by Richard Nixon. Discuss the point of v

iew, reasoning, and evidence that he uses in his speech. Also, note the use of any logical fallacies. Cite textual evidence from the speech to support your analysis.
English
2 answers:
artcher [175]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Point of view: Nixon’s point of view is that he is innocent of the charges against him.

Reasoning: Nixon argues that the independent audit and his honor and integrity in other areas of his life show his innocence.

Evidence: Nixon cites the evidence of the audit. He does not offer much other evidence that is relevant to the accusations.

Rhetorical Strategies

Ethos: Nixon gives his audience several reasons to trust him and he stresses the fact that he came from a modest background:

I will have to start early, I was born in 1913. Our family was one of modest circumstances, and most of my early life was spent in a store out in East Whittier. It was a grocery store, one of those family enterprises.

The only reason we were able to make it go was because my mother and dad had five boys, and we all worked in the store. I worked my way through college, and, to a great extent, through law school. And then in 1940, probably the best thing that ever happened to me happened. I married Pat who is sitting over here.

We had a rather difficult time after we were married, like so many of the young couples who might be listening to us. I practiced law. She continued to teach school.

Pathos: In his speech, Nixon uses emotional appeal by referencing his family and his family’s dog, Checkers. These references are meant to stir emotions in the audience.

It was a little cocker spaniel dog, in a crate that he had sent all the way from Texas, black and white, spotted, and our little girl Tricia, the six year old, named it Checkers.

And you know, the kids, like all kids, loved the dog, and I just want to say this, right now, that regardless of what they say about it, we are going to keep it.

Logos: Nixon attempts to use the findings of the audit by an outside company to show that he has done nothing wrong.

Let me say, incidentally, that some of you may say, "Well, that is all right, Senator, that is your explanation, but have you got any proof?" And I would like to tell you this evening that just an hour ago we received an independent audit of this entire fund.

Logical Fallacies

Red Herring: Nixon describes his wife’s work as an auditor. This has little relevance to the topic at hand and is intended to distract his audience.

My wife's sitting over here. She's a wonderful stenographer. She used to teach stenography and she used to teach shorthand in high school. That was when I met her. And I can tell you folks that she's worked many hours at night and many hours on Saturdays and Sundays in my office, and she's done a fine job, and I am proud to say tonight that in the six years I've been in the House and the Senate of the United States, Pat Nixon has never been on the Government pay roll.

Straw Man: Nixon characterizes those criticizing him as problematic in order to advance his own argument.

Now, the usual political thing to do when charges are made against you is to either ignore them or to deny them without giving details. I believe we have had enough of that in the United States, particularly with the present administration in Washington D.C.

Explanation:

Snezhnost [94]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:Point of view: Nixon’s point of view is that he is innocent of the charges against him.

Reasoning: Nixon argues that the independent audit and his honor and integrity in other areas of his life show his innocence.

Evidence: Nixon cites the evidence of the audit. He does not offer much other evidence that is relevant to the accusations.

Rhetorical Strategies

Ethos: Nixon gives his audience several reasons to trust him and he stresses the fact that he came from a modest background:

I will have to start early, I was born in 1913. Our family was one of modest circumstances, and most of my early life was spent in a store out in East Whittier. It was a grocery store, one of those family enterprises.

The only reason we were able to make it go was because my mother and dad had five boys, and we all worked in the store. I worked my way through college, and, to a great extent, through law school. And then in 1940, probably the best thing that ever happened to me happened. I married Pat who is sitting over here.

We had a rather difficult time after we were married, like so many of the young couples who might be listening to us. I practiced law. She continued to teach school.

Pathos: In his speech, Nixon uses emotional appeal by referencing his family and his family’s dog, Checkers. These references are meant to stir emotions in the audience.

It was a little cocker spaniel dog, in a crate that he had sent all the way from Texas, black and white, spotted, and our little girl Tricia, the six year old, named it Checkers.

And you know, the kids, like all kids, loved the dog, and I just want to say this, right now, that regardless of what they say about it, we are going to keep it.

Logos: Nixon attempts to use the findings of the audit by an outside company to show that he has done nothing wrong.

Let me say, incidentally, that some of you may say, "Well, that is all right, Senator, that is your explanation, but have you got any proof?" And I would like to tell you this evening that just an hour ago we received an independent audit of this entire fund.

Logical Fallacies

Red Herring: Nixon describes his wife’s work as an auditor. This has little relevance to the topic at hand and is intended to distract his audience.

My wife's sitting over here. She's a wonderful stenographer. She used to teach stenography and she used to teach shorthand in high school. That was when I met her. And I can tell you folks that she's worked many hours at night and many hours on Saturdays and Sundays in my office, and she's done a fine job, and I am proud to say tonight that in the six years I've been in the House and the Senate of the United States, Pat Nixon has never been on the Government pay roll.

Straw Man: Nixon characterizes those criticizing him as problematic in order to advance his own argument.

Now, the usual political thing to do when charges are made against you is to either ignore them or to deny them without giving details. I believe we have had enough of that in the United States, particularly with the present administration in Washington D.C.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which sentence is using the semicolon correctly? Select the best TWO. *
anzhelika [568]
<h2>hey there!</h2>

Explanation:

i hope this is correct I think it is B)Here is all I want for my birthday; a beautiful dress, a delicious cake, and the company of good friends.

<h3>hope it is correct and have a great day!</h3>
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Use page numbers and quotations to write a three- to five-sentence paragraph about one theme from your novel or short story. Rem
grin007 [14]

Answer:

can I have more details

Explanation:

please

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following employs an ad hominem fallacy?
Colt1911 [192]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

A is positive. It says that there are benefits to joining a team. The answer is not A.

B is the same thing so the answer is not B either.

C There is nothing person in C, but it might require proof.

The answer is D because the tone is derogatory. Certainly a better statement can be made other than using video games as an argument.

8 0
2 years ago
Then he sat up straight and said, “We'd better start home.” Not “shall I take you home?” or “Do you live far?” but “We'd better
marissa [1.9K]
The explanation expressed in this excerpt reveals that the narrator HAS A NATURAL INSIGHT ABOUT WHAT THE WORDS LIKELY SUGGESTED.
From the passage given above it can be seen that the narrator has the capacity to infer and interpret spoken words in order to get their true meaning. She correctly guess in the passage, that the boy had a natural desire to take her home.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What phrases in the passage are verb phrases?
lukranit [14]
Whats the passage ?
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the dreadful oracle that was delivered to King Acrisius?
    9·1 answer
  • Research skills are fundamental to: A. academic writing. B. all types of writing. C. education, literature, business, and other
    10·1 answer
  • Any individual can become an expert in anything.<br> a. True<br> b. False
    11·1 answer
  • 11. What does Jose have to do with Tita's father's death?
    12·1 answer
  • Why is it better for groups to be small—twelve or fewer people?
    13·2 answers
  • Why does the monster want Victor to come to his hut?
    8·1 answer
  • I need HELP QUCK
    15·1 answer
  • Trying new restaurants. That’s one good thing.<br> Add comma if needed if not just say NO
    15·1 answer
  • Malawi windmill boy with big fans
    10·1 answer
  • How can a musical work be an argument? What tools does a musician or composer use to make an argument?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!