1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
forsale [732]
3 years ago
9

What justification did the Soviet leadership use to rationalize the Holomodor? The Russian serfs purposely reduced the amount of

goods they were producing in protest, which reduced much needed revenue from exporting grain. The Ukrainian protests would disrupt Stalin's plans for collectivizing agricultural farmland across the Soviet Union. The process of collectivizing agricultural production allowed Ukranian farmers to specialize in particular products, leading them to demand too high of a price for them from the Soviet government. The peasant revolt following collectivization of agricultural lands was an anti-communist uprising supported by Western democracies that feared collectivization would push the Soviets ahead of them.
History
2 answers:
Vesnalui [34]3 years ago
6 0

The peasant revolt following collectivization of agricultural lands was an anti-communist uprising supported by Western democracies that feared collectivization would push the Soviets ahead of them. The holomodor involved deliberate starvation of masses in Ukraine to push them into communism submission.

Burka [1]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is B) The Ukrainian protests would disrupt Stalin's plans for collectivizing agricultural farmland across the Soviet Union.

The justification that the Soviet leadership used to rationalize the Holomodor was "The Ukrainian protests would disrupt Stalin's plans for collectivizing agricultural farmland across the Soviet Union."

The Holomodor was the genocide of Ukrainians in 1932-1933. The Soviets were responsible because they wanted to oppress the Ukrainians and make them obey Soviet rules. The people from Ukrania wanted independence from the Soviet Union and that did not was convenient for Joseph Stalin's plans. The famine killed millions of Ukranian people.

You might be interested in
N what way did each colony's government mirror the government of britain?
just olya [345]

by most defiantly drinking 3 pounds of Lipton tea

4 0
3 years ago
The communist manifesto encouraged the working classes by stating ?
Dmitry [639]
It stated that they were the ones who built their states and that history is a clash of classes which needs to end because classes only exist in our minds. It encouraged them by stating that they were the same as those who were in charge and like aristocrats.
3 0
3 years ago
What were some causes and effects of shays rebelion?
MAXImum [283]
A cause for Shays' Rebellion was the debt, and an effect of the rebellion was the ratification of the Constitution to form a stronger central government. 
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read this excerpt from Edwards's sermon. The devil is waiting for them, hell is gaping for them, the flames gather and flash abo
solong [7]

Answer:

In his sermon "Sinners In the Hands of An Angry God", Rev. Jonathan Edwards used the word "gaping" to project an image of hell that is opened so wide that it will swallow anyone who sins and move away from the true God.

Explanation:

In his sermon "Sinners In The Hands of An Angry God", Jonathan Edwards gave a detailed description of what life is for those who stay away from the almighty God. He chooses to address this speech/ sermon to try to get the colonies back on tract to God and shy away from material things.

In this specific passage of the sermon, Edwards is describing in graphic details the fate of those who sin. He presents an image of hell "<em>gaping for them, flames gather(ing) and flash(ing) about them</em>" while "<em>the devil is waiting for them</em>". This parallel language structure projects an image of hell as enormous, daunting and dangerous, which it rightly is. But with the choice of words that he employs, he was able to instill a sense of fear in his listeners. This word is so effective as it <em>presents an image of hell as something that is open wide, welcoming them for an eternal life of suffering</em>. He verbally perfects showing an image that will frighten them and make then turn away from their sins.

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the Norris laguardia act
marysya [2.9K]
The Norris–LaGuardia Act<span> (also known as the Anti-Injunction Bill) was a 1932 United States federal law that banned yellow-dog contracts, barred federal courts from issuing injunctions against nonviolent labor disputes, and created a positive right of noninterference by employers against workers joining trade unions.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Select the five Republican presidents:
    12·2 answers
  • A reason the United States was able to acquire Florida in the Adams-Onís Treaty was that it agreed to give up claims on
    10·2 answers
  • Least one successful reformed that address to the progressive goal of regulating business?
    10·1 answer
  • What impacts do debates have on polls?
    15·1 answer
  • How did the KKK end?
    13·1 answer
  • The Supreme Court declares an executive order unconstitutional. This is an example of ____.
    15·1 answer
  • The Renaissance encouraged people to:
    15·2 answers
  • How was France introduced to the renaissance
    9·1 answer
  • Why do you think that non-African nations supported certain factions that claimed power in the newly independent nations of Afri
    12·1 answer
  • Why did some enslaved Africans pretend not to understand what they were told to do?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!