1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dimaraw [331]
3 years ago
14

Which was a consequence of the Protestant Reformation?

History
1 answer:
miskamm [114]3 years ago
7 0
The main consequence was the  wars of religion.
You might be interested in
Match the Following
motikmotik

Answer:

1. number of believers added on day of Pentecost  - 3,000

2. driving force or motive  - impetus

3. strong hatred; active hostility  - animosity

4. one who preaches the Gospel  - evangelist

5. number of believers added following Peter's sermon at the temple  - 5,000

6. doctor of the law who spoke in defense of the disciples  - Gamaliel

7. Roman centurion who received the gospel  - Cornelius

8. place where Peter received a vision concerning the Gospel and the Gentiles  - Joppa

9. Gospel first taken to them by Peter  - Gentiles

3 0
3 years ago
What were the effects after Diocletian split the Roman Empire?
stealth61 [152]

Answer:

The Roman Empire was once a superpower. Back in the days of the early 2nd century, Emperor Trajan stretched the kingdom's territory to its maximum. After that, how to secure the frontier had become an issue that all the future emperors had to address. Because most of those emperors were not nearly as capable as Trajan, the Roman Empire was soon in trouble. By the 3rd century, the situation had grown so bad that this once formidable powerhouse was at the brink of self-destruction. During the period from 235 A.D. to 284 A.D. (often called the crisis of the third century, the military anarchy, or the imperial crisis), more than two-dozen emperors came and went. Out-of-control inflation brought the economy to its knees. And foreign tribes continued to harass the borders. Just as things could not get worse for the Roman Empire, relief finally arrived. In November of 284 A.D., Diocletian, a forceful Roman general, seized power and declared himself the new emperor. One of his earliest orders was to split the Roman Empire in two. He kept the eastern part and gave the western half to his colleague, Maximian.  Diocletian's decision was bold but practical. He figured that the Roman Empire had simply grown too big over the years to be managed effectively by a single person. In 285 A.D., he named his trusted military friend, Maximian, as a Caesar or a junior emperor, while he himself was named an Augustus or a senior emperor. The following year, Diocletian promoted Maximian to be his equal, so both men held the title of Augustus and ruled the split Roman Empire side-by-side. Diocletian chose the city of Nicomedia (modern day's Izmit, Turkey) to be the capital of his Eastern Roman Empire, whereas Maximian picked Milan to be the capital of his Western Roman Empire. With the kingdom broken into two, Diocletian and Maximian were each responsible for fighting the enemies in their respective territory. As it was no longer necessary to stretch the troops across the entire empire, it was much easier to put down the rebels. Diocletian's daring experiment paid off handsomely. By 293 A.D., Diocletian decided to go a step further and resolve the issue of succession once and for all. That year, both of the senior emperors handpicked their own Caesar. Diocletian chose Galerius, and Maximian selected Constantius. Galerius and Constantius were like apprentices. They did not sit idly waiting for the two senior emperors to die or to retire. Instead, they were each given a sizable territory and had their own capital. Galerius resided at Sirmium (in today's Serbia), and Constantius camped at Trier (in today's Germany). Diocletian called this new power structure tetrarchy or "rule by four."

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Moral goodness or an adherence to ethical principles.
erik [133]
The answer is the 1st one. Hope it helps :)
8 0
2 years ago
Looking back at history, women often had very different protection under the law than men, depending on which government ruled.
Leto [7]
Well actually I don't know but I do know that women were payed less than men and that a women would be thought of a some kind of maid.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
About how many people are there in the world?
Lynna [10]
IS ABOUT 7, 500,788,945
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was a result of racism?
    13·2 answers
  • How were the political structures of the Jamestown and Plymouth colonies different?
    9·1 answer
  • Select problems experienced by the average factory worker.
    5·1 answer
  • What did john quincy adams do
    14·2 answers
  • How does this 1835 image titled "Jim Crow" relate to the Civi war era?
    10·1 answer
  • A security policy rule displayed in italic font indicates which condition
    5·1 answer
  • CRISTO RAMIREZ
    9·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELPPP
    10·1 answer
  • During the 1700s, people in different colonies produced different kinds of things to sell. For example, people in the southern c
    6·1 answer
  • What does jude learn by listening to her classmates stories about their old homes
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!