Answer: paradox
Expiation: It is clearly sand so it is obviously found to be true, which is what makes it a paradox
Answer:
2) by noticing how the character interacts with other characters
3) by noticing details about what the character says, does, and thinks
4) by noticing how the other characters perceive the character
7) by noticing statements the narrator makes about the character's appearance
Explanation:
Remember that indirect characterization means that the author makes the readers infer the character's personality through their actions, dialogue, thoughts, feelings, interactions with other characters, or physical appearance.
<span>Nick uses the term "holocaust" because it was a spree of death to the people around him and even love. Daisy killed Myrtle, in return Tom told on Gatsby and Wilson killed Gatsby then himself. It was like a chain reaction. It was termed holocaust by Nick because to him I believe he thinks that the wrong people died, he knows the truth that Gatsby is innocent and he knows that the Myrtle thing was cause because of Tom having driven the yellow car earlier in the evening. It wasn't meant to happen that way but like the holocaust even the innocent die, for no good reason. I'm sure if we had our choice the only person that would have died would have been Tom, but yet he doesn't seem as such a horrible person to me anymore. I had mentioned how I see that love has died as well, the innocent love Gatsby has for Daisy now gone and left to her memory, the thoughtless love Tom had for Myrtle now gone as well, and the love Nick had for Jordan will never bee said. All innocent things that lead to the destruction of innocent people.</span><span>
His movements are slow through town in the three hours and figures out who Gatsby is a where he lives.</span><span>The holocaust is referring to the death of the main characters relationships, Gatsby and Daisy and Tom</span>and Myrtle, and George and Myrtle
You asked the right guy. I recently experienced this awful problem. It helps you be more aware of your surroundings.
Answer:
Six Myths About the Good Life is a book published in 2006 and written by Joel J. Kupperman about values; when it comes to his argument about "pleasure not always leading to the optimal" Kupperman says that the constant pursuit of pleasure is just anxiety, a compulsion for more regardless of any consequences and the evidence of a deeper existential and psychological trauma due to their inability to get fulfilment or gratification. He also states that life with infinite pleasures would be boring. I believe that from those arguments, the most convincing one would be the 1st one where the constant pursuit of pleasure not always lead to an optimal outcome or satisfaction, especially if anxiety is involved to the extent of people not aware of what actually makes them happy and going for the next pleasant target without consciously enjoying what they already obtained but going by inertia.
