1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
RSB [31]
3 years ago
11

Vietcong was a term used to describe

History
1 answer:
Kisachek [45]3 years ago
5 0
The National Liberation Front of South Vietnam, which was a mass political organisation that fought against the United States and its allies. Hope this helps!
You might be interested in
What is the Tea Party
Andrew [12]


Question: What is the Tea Party?

Options: A. a gathering of democrats in the white house rose garden ; B. a new american political party ; C. A movement of political conservatives ; D. a nickname for the republican-controlled house of representatives

Answer: A movement of political conservatives (option C.)





5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The biggest strengths of the Roman POLITICAL system were…?
Ann [662]

Answer:

The greatest strength of the Roman system of government was also its greatest weakness: the reliance on precedent. The way the government was formally constituted was not the way it operated in practice.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did militiamen let down the US troops during the invasion of Canada in the War of 1812?
Nana76 [90]
The best answer is <span>D:The militiamen refused to cross the border into Canada since their military contract did not require them to do so.
</span>
The American militia, while great in number, were ill-disciplined and many contingencies refused to move past American territory into Canada, claiming it was beyond their responsibilities. They generally performed well in their home states and did worse and worse the farther they got from their homes. 
7 0
3 years ago
Which is the BEST example of
astraxan [27]

Answer:

B. Put less work in, get more work out

Explanation:

Efficiency means that you want to maximize something with putting little in. With this, the only answer that would make sense would be B.

If you were to put more work in and get less work out that would not be efficient at all. It would be the complete opposite.

If you were to put less work in and get less work out that is still inefficient.

If you put more work in and get more work out that could appear as efficient, but you are still putting in a lot of work which is not efficient.

Thus the best answer would be B. Put less work in, get more work out.

Hope this helps!! Ask questions if you need!

4 0
2 years ago
How did wwi cause wwii
a_sh-v [17]
In many causes what happened in WW2 caused just like WW1 battling
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe the view that the British had toward the wealthy Colonists and compare that to how the wealthy Colonists viewed the "co
    11·1 answer
  • Lincoln considered slavery as:
    10·2 answers
  • Why did the United States send military aid to Somalia
    11·1 answer
  • According to the Preamble, what are some goals of the Constitution?
    6·2 answers
  • 2. Review the list of events below. All occurred during the 1960s and 1970s and all helped shape the future of the United States
    8·1 answer
  • What political rights did men in England have that colonial men did not?
    15·2 answers
  • Regarding the Magna Carta, which statement is false?
    8·1 answer
  • What evidence does dr.ward use to back his claim that factories were unhealthy and unsafe for children?
    7·1 answer
  • Please help i’ll mark you as brainlist
    6·1 answer
  • Would it violate the law if you dont go to church and stay home?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!