Answer:
The correct answer is - No,
Explanation:
The correct answer is - No,
The answer is no because the broker brings a buyer who is ready to give 1005 cash offer which is against the legal agreement defined by the owner. owner state that he is only taking a 25% cash offer.
Therefore the owner wouldn't consider the broker and didn't due broker commission.
Answer:
reduce output
Explanation:
The marginal cost ($26) is greater than the marginal revenue ($25). In order to maximise profit, marginal cost should he reduced up to the point where marginal cost equals marginal benefit.
A firm should shutdown, reduce production to zero if average variable cost is greater than price but in this question, the firm shouldn't shut down since price ($25) is greater than average variable cost ($24).
I hope my answer helps you
<h2>
10 workers would cause the marginal to exceed the marginal benefits.</h2>
Explanation:
- Let us understand the term "Marginal benefits".
- It is the additional amount that the consumer "willing to pay" for an additional goods or a service.
- In terms of producers, the marginal benefit is termed as marginal revenue.
- Here according to the situation given in the question as to how many workers to hire could be answered by the number 10.
- Marginal revenue always falls below marginal cost.
- It is the revenue that the organization receives for selling one additional unit.
Answer:
The equivalent units for conversion costs= 6,912 units
Explanation:
<em>The weighted average method of valuation would be used to determine the the equivalent units for conversion costs</em>
<em>Under the weighted average method of valuation, to account for completed units, it is assumed that the entire degree of work required is done in the period under consideration. So there is no separation of the completed units into opening inventory and fully worked. </em>
Equivalent unit = Degree of completion × Units of inventory
<em>Items units Equivalent unit</em>
Completed unit 3,300 3,300× 100 = 3.300
Closing work in progress 4,300 4,300× 84%= <u>3,612
</u>
Total equivalent units <u>6,912
</u>
The equivalent units for conversion costs= 6,912 units
