Answer: We have assumed constant returns to scale.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage simply stated that an economy should produce the goods whereby the said economy has a lower opportunity cost than its counterpart.
Based on the analysis in the question, the inaccurate assumption is that we have assumed constant returns to scale. This means that an increase in the inputs such as capital and labour which are used in producction will also cause an identical increase in output. In reality, this isn't always true.
Answer:
c rational expectations were held by most of the public.
Explanation:
Classical economists only focused on the long run goals. the problem is that Ricardo and Smith are still waiting for the long run to show up. Theoretically, classical economics are great, but they failed miserably in the real world. The problem is that it is based on the assumption that human beings are rational and that they will always act rationally, regardless of what is going on. For example, even if you are fired, classical economists say that your expenses should not decrease. But on the real world, if you are fired, the money you have decreases and so will your expenses.
Answer:
Treynor ratio = <u>Market return - Risk-free rate</u>
Portfolio beta
= <u>11.6 - 3.0</u>
1.02
= 8.43%
Explanation:
Treynor ratio is the ratio of risk-premium to portfolio beta. Risk-premium is the excess of market return over risk-free rate, Treynor ratio is used for measuring the performance of a portfolio.
Answer:
1st may of 2020, lol let not....
The book value of the company’s assets is the sum of the values
of individual assets entered in the books of the company. The following would
be its book value:
Cash $34,600
Accounts receivable $54,200
Inventory $92,300
Fixed assets $234,500
Accumulated depreciation of fixed assets ($107,900)
Total book value of the assets of the firm $307,700
