Answer:
A. Landscape lawns produce positive externality.
B. Sports vehicle generates a positive externality
C. Walk to work creates positive externality.
D. Cigarettes create a negative externality.
Explanation:
Positive externality occurs when society gets benefit from a persons act. Susan has created lawns near her house and there are beautiful flowers in the lawn. This will be relaxing for those who pass near by the lawns. There will be fresh air coming from the lawn and society will look pleasant.
Negative externality is one in which society is harmed by the act of a person. This happens when Anita smokes at a bus stop. There are other travelers who will be present at the bus stop might be harmed from the smoke which arises from the cigarette.
Answer:
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) helps families, older adults, and individuals pay for groceries. ... SNAP benefits provide food security, stimulate local economies, and support farmers and the agriculture industry through the purchases of Pennsylvania-grown and processed foods.
Explanation:
Answer:
market maven
Explanation:
Market maven -
The term is associated with the person, who has the complete knowledge of the goods and services and the market , is referred to as a market maven.
A market maven has a lot of connection with various people and is very well - versed on the current state of the market , and has some discreet information which a normal person can never get access to .
The very so famous market maven are - George Soros , John Bogle and Warren Buffett.
Hence , from the given scenario of the question,
The correct answer is market maven .
Answer:
The number of units started into production is 7,000.
Explanation:
Number of units started into production = Units transferred out + units of ending work in process - units of beginning work in process
= 9,000 + 2,000 - 4,000
= 7,000
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
