A command economy could probably solve it faster.
This is because the government runs the economy in a command system and not the market. The government could in such a case focus all its resources on solving the crisis unlike the free market economy where people dealing with economy might be disinterested since it wouldn't affect their businesses or anything similar.
Decision-making power in an autocracy is in the control of "<span>a single individual". This is most likely due to a despotic ruler with even more power than most kings and queens. </span>
The correct answer is A) it instituted economic reforms, C) it applied democratic reforms and D) it freed political prisoners.
<em>In 2010, Burma's government changed in that it instituted economic reforms, it applied democratic reforms and it freed political prisoners.</em>
In 1989, Burma officially changed its name to Myanmar. On March 2010, the government publicly announces that it passed laws to organize elections. The National Democratic Front is legally recognized and omptees in the election. In the November elections, the Union Solidarity and Development Party was the winner. This represented an important change of military government to a civilian government. The new Burma's government changed in that it instituted economic reforms, it applied democratic reforms and it freed political prisoners.
Explanation:
Getting someone who stand in your favour
