Answer:
$30.00
Explanation:
The price of the stock can be derived from the stock theoretical price formula given and explained below:
stock price=expected dividend/(market return-growth rate)
expected dividend=dividend paid today*(1+growth rate)
expected dividend=$2*(1+5%)
expected dividend=$2.10
market rate of return=12%
growth rate=5%
stock price=$2.10/(12%-5%)
stock price=$2.10/7%
stock price=$30.00
Answer: a. Anticipate the effect your message will have on the receiver.
b. Analyze the bad-news situation
Explanation:
In the Phase 1 of the writing process, it is required that one should analyze the bad-news situation, and then anticipate the effect that such news will on have on the receiver. After this has been one, the message will then be adapted accordingly.
In a scenario whereby it's anticipated that the reader will be upset about the news, then the message might be reshaped so that the reader won't be angry.
Answer:
$46,000
Explanation:
We can find out the the revaluation gain that need to be reported at the year end by just deducting the the cost of the investment by its current fair value .
DATA
Fair value = 588,000
Cost = 542,000
Revaluation gain = Current fair value - Cost
Revaluation gain = 588,000 - 542,000
Revaluation gain = $46,000
The revaluation gain of $46,000 will be reported in other compreensive income of smith's financial statements.
Answer:
<u>Contribution Margin Statement</u>
Sales revenue ($100 x 980) $98,000
Less Variable costs:
cost of goods sold ($58 x 980) $56,840
Commissions expense ($5 x 980) $4,900
Shipping expense ($3 x 980) <u>$2,940</u>
<u>$64,680</u>
Gross margin $33,320
Less Fixed costs:
Salaries expense $7,900
Advertising expense <u>$5,800</u>
<u>$13,700</u>
Net Profit <u>$19,620</u>
The above answer is definitely correct in its details. I'd just like to emphasize a couple of important ideas about Hoover's response.
<span>He tried to do more to fix the economy than any president had ever done before. The government had been very hands-off up to that point.He believed the government should not go in debt no matter what. This limited what he was willing to do. Please note that economists back then agreed with this idea so it's not like Hoover was just being mean. In fact, FDR believed the same thing and it's often said that he undermined the New Deal by trying to balance the budget too soon.</span>
So, overall what I want to point out is that Hoover did more than anyone else, and he did what most economists of the time would have said was the right thing to do. But it didn't work and so he's seen as one of the worst presidents ever, which seems a bit unfair.
