Answer:
Yes, there is evidence to support that claim that instructor 1 is more effective than instructor 2
Step-by-step explanation:
We can conduct a hypothesis test for the difference of 2 proportions. If there is no difference in instructor quality, then the difference in proportions will be zero. That makes the null hypothesis
H0: p1 - p2 = 0
The question is asking whether instructor 1 is more effective, so if he is, his proportion will be larger than instructor 2, so the difference would result in a positive number. This makes the alternate hypothesis
Ha: p1 - p2 > 0
This is a right tailed test (the > or < sign always point to the critical region like an arrowhead)
We will use a significance level of 95% to conduct our test. This makes the critical values for our test statistic: z > 1.645.
If our test statistic falls in this region, we will reject the null hypothesis.
<u>See the attached photo for the hypothesis test and conclusion</u>
Answer:
$179.20
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Hope this helps</u>
It should be 140 degrees.
Answer:The accompanying table shows the number of trials and the ... Write the exponential regression equation for this set of data, rounding all values to no decimal places. Using this equation, find the value of her stock, to the nearest dollar, 10 years ... culture over a 5-hour period, where x is the time, in hours, and y is the number.
mark me brinlest plzz
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
This is a probability related question, let the event be E
We know that the likelihood of an event happening is given as
Pr(E)=1
if an event will not occur the probability is
Pr(E)=0
a. This event is impossible: Pr(E)=0
b.This event will occur more often than not, but is not extremely likely:
Pr(E)=0<E>0.5
c.This event is extremely unlikely, but it will occur once in a while in a long sequence of trials:
Pr(E)=0<E<0.5
d.This event will occur for sure: Pr(E)=0