The case filed by Gerwin against Baker will be null and void, as thee is no existence of any legal contract between the parties as such.
<h3>What is a legal contract?</h3>
A contract is said to be a legal one when the party who is presented with such an offer accepts on the terms and with a condition that the offer must be for legal activities.
In case when any of the criterion mentioned above are not followed by the offeror or the offeree, then in such case, any lawsuit filed against the plaintiff will be considered as null and void.
Hence, it can be concluded that there is no legal contract between Gerwin and Baker, and thus their cases are null and void.
Learn more about a legal contract here:
brainly.com/question/3208041
#SPJ1
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The quality should be about the same.
The social responsibility should also be about the same.
There shouldn't be side effects of most products. If you are speaking of medications, there really ought to be the same side effects with the same severity and the same statistical occurrences.
The only difference is the company selling the product.
There have been exceptions to this where different "fillers" were used in the generic brand and the side effects were different and more severe. I've only heard of one case however and I cannot remember what it was. Manufacturers were careful not to let it happen again.
Answer:
A. Landscape lawns produce positive externality.
B. Sports vehicle generates a positive externality
C. Walk to work creates positive externality.
D. Cigarettes create a negative externality.
Explanation:
Positive externality occurs when society gets benefit from a persons act. Susan has created lawns near her house and there are beautiful flowers in the lawn. This will be relaxing for those who pass near by the lawns. There will be fresh air coming from the lawn and society will look pleasant.
Negative externality is one in which society is harmed by the act of a person. This happens when Anita smokes at a bus stop. There are other travelers who will be present at the bus stop might be harmed from the smoke which arises from the cigarette.
Answer:
An investment with more liquidity would be ideal for someone who knows they will nee cash in the near future.
Explanation:
More liquid assets are those that can be turn into cash more quickly than those that less liquid assets.
If one is thinking about investing in a liquid asset, surely is because it will need the cash in the short run. On the contrary, we could invest in other financial instruments less liquid (typically those who offer higher yields and have longer terms), because we are not going to need the money for the moment, and we want to take advantage of that to get a higher yields.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
once a style is chosen all pieces should be in the designated style
