1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tatiana [17]
3 years ago
11

The first step in the scientific method is to

History
2 answers:
mafiozo [28]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Form a hypothosis

Explanation:

The sientific method

Nadya [2.5K]3 years ago
5 0
The answer is form a hypothesis.
You might be interested in
What is solar thermal energy used to do- heat homes or power homes?
Arada [10]
Heat cause thremal has to do with heat
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
based on the excerpt above which of the following viewpoints most directly influenced the writers of the declaration of independ
nekit [7.7K]
Based on the excerpt above, which of the following viewpoints most directly influenced the writers of the Declaration of Independence?

A belief in the right of self-rule through a republican government



Hope this helps!
8 0
3 years ago
Karma is determined by, living within, or following
IgorLugansk [536]

Answer:  

A. one's dharma.     good or bad actions determine the future modes of an individual's existence.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What four things should you look for when analyzing sources in history?
skad [1K]

When you analyze a primary source, you are undertaking the most important job of the historian. There is no better way to understand events in the past than by examining the sources--whether journals, newspaper articles, letters, court case records, novels, artworks, music or autobiographies--that people from that period left behind.

Each historian, including you, will approach a source with a different set of experiences and skills, and will therefore interpret the document differently. Remember that there is no one right interpretation. However, if you do not do a careful and thorough job, you might arrive at a wrong interpretation.

In order to analyze a primary source you need information about two things: the document itself, and the era from which it comes. You can base your information about the time period on the readings you do in class and on lectures. On your own you need to think about the document itself. The following questions may be helpful to you as you begin to analyze the sources:

1. Look at the physical nature of your source. This is particularly important and powerful if you are dealing with an original source (i.e., an actual old letter, rather than a transcribed and published version of the same letter). What can you learn from the form of the source? (Was it written on fancy paper in elegant handwriting, or on scrap-paper, scribbled in pencil?) What does this tell you?

2. Think about the purpose of the source. What was the author's message or argument? What was he/she trying to get across? Is the message explicit, or are there implicit messages as well?

3. How does the author try to get the message across? What methods does he/she use?

4. What do you know about the author? Race, sex, class, occupation, religion, age, region, political beliefs? Does any of this matter? How?

5. Who constituted the intended audience? Was this source meant for one person's eyes, or for the public? How does that affect the source?

6. What can a careful reading of the text (even if it is an object) tell you? How does the language work? What are the important metaphors or symbols? What can the author's choice of words tell you? What about the silences--what does the author choose NOT to talk about?

Now you can evaluate the source as historical evidence.

1. Is it prescriptive--telling you what people thought should happen--or descriptive--telling you what people thought did happen?

2. Does it describe ideology and/or behavior?

3. Does it tell you about the beliefs/actions of the elite, or of "ordinary" people? From whose perspective?

4. What historical questions can you answer using this source? What are the benefits of using this kind of source?

5. What questions can this source NOT help you answer? What are the limitations of this type of source?

6. If we have read other historians' interpretations of this source or sources like this one, how does your analysis fit with theirs? In your opinion, does this source support or challenge their argument?

Remember, you cannot address each and every one of these questions in your presentation or in your paper, and I wouldn't want you to.



hope it helps

7 0
3 years ago
Someone please help me with this asap !!! i’ll give you the brainliest
anzhelika [568]
Answer
Can you take another photo it’s blurry
Explanation
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Did America bomb Japan and that is the reason why Japan bombed the Pearl Harbor?
    9·1 answer
  • What was the status of the civil rights movement prior to 1954?
    15·1 answer
  • During the high middle ages, monasteries were considered religious centers, as well as
    11·2 answers
  • HELP PLS! RELIGION QUESTION
    13·1 answer
  • Which of these statements is true?
    7·1 answer
  • Have the Supreme Court Rulings helped or hindered our nation, explain!
    14·1 answer
  • This is the name given to the famous people of the revolutionary war era who help create the constitution of the united states.
    7·1 answer
  • Why do you think both Memphis and Shelby<br> County have a mayor?<br><br><br> Please I need it
    11·1 answer
  • ANYONE HERE'S THE STORY PLEASE HELP ME:(​
    8·2 answers
  • What caused the United States to issue the Truman Doctrine?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!