<h2>Answer:
</h2>
Activities that fall outside what society tolerates is known as deviant acts.
<h2>Explanation:
</h2>
Deviant acts are one such kind of action that is complete outside the norms and expectations of the society. It is put into the categories of the formal and the informal patterns. Formal is related with the criminal acts that is dictated under the law and informal is related with the social norms.
Thomas Jefferson wrote it to James Madison in a letter talking about Shay's Rebellion.
Because the united states believed that it was its well... "destiny" to go out in the world or at least west, and take what ever land was there, as the united states was the great liberator for the people who wanted to be free- so it was its destiny to grow its borders, anyways, this made adapting new states into the union almost policy and the united states was eager to add more land and territory to its borders.
Answer: Adolescence-limited offenders who are protected <u>from the streets </u>have a higher likelihood of outgrowing their criminal behavior.
Explanation:
Any type of criminal act <em>affects society</em> in general, so that effective treatment of adolescents who commit crimes benefits everyone. Crime is a form of social <u>maladjustment.</u>
The offender is a product of the human genotype that has been maligned by a social field, such as, <em>inadequate work, street wandering and unemployment.</em>
It is important that the <u>family</u>, the main control mechanism, teach their children unacceptable behaviors and <u>educate them.</u>
It is also evident that adolescents <u>need to belong to a group</u> to download their problems, so we could consider that a good <u>school environment </u>would also be a help for the problem to don't spread.
When testing a hypothesis using a null hypothesis, you use a statement that negates your hypothesis, and, within a certain level of certainty, see if the null hypothesis can be rejected. When testing the null hypothesis, you typically want to be around 95% sure that you can reject it (confidence interval is 95%).
In Rose's case, she is testing the hypothesis that there is a correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior.
Her null hypothesis would be:
"There is not a positive correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior"
or
"The correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior is less than or equal to zero"