Answer:
Option "Inversely" is correct.
Explanation:
Option “Inversely” is correct because the increase in price level exhibits inflation and a rise in inflation decreases the purchasing power of money. However, if the price level decreases or inflation decreases, then the purchasing power of money increases. Therefore we can see that increase in price level decreases the purchasing power and a decrease in price level increases the purchasing power. Therefore, there is an inverse relationship.
Back in 2015, McDonald’s was struggling. In Europe, sales were down 1.4% across the previous 6 years; 3.3% down in the US and almost 10% down across Africa and the Middle East. There were a myriad of challenges to overcome. Rising expectations of customer experience, new standards of convenience, weak in-store technology, a sprawling menu, a PR-bruised brand and questionable ingredients to name but a few.
McDonald’s are the original fast-food innovators; creating a level of standardisation that is quite frankly, remarkable. Buy a Big Mac in Beijing and it’ll taste the same as in Stratford-Upon Avon.
So when you’ve optimised product delivery, supply chain and flavour experience to such an incredible degree — how do you increase bottom line growth? It’s not going to come from making the Big Mac cheaper to produce — you’ve already turned those stones over (multiple times).
The answer of course, is to drive purchase frequency and increase margins through new products.
Numerous studies have shown that no matter what options are available, people tend to stick with the default options and choices they’ve made habitually. This is even more true when someone faces a broad selection of choices. We try to mitigate the risk of buyers remorse by sticking with the choices we know are ‘safe’.
McDonald’s has a uniquely pervasive presence in modern life with many of us having developed a pattern of ordering behaviour over the course of our lives (from Happy Meals to hangover cures). This creates a unique, and less cited, challenge for McDonald’s’ reinvention: how do you break people out of the default buying behaviours they’ve developed over decades?
In its simplest sense, the new format is designed to improve customer experience, which will in turn drive frequency and a shift in buying behaviour (for some) towards higher margin items. The most important shift in buying patterns is to drive reappraisal of the Signature range to make sure they maximise potential spend from those customers who can afford, and want, a more premium experience.
I hope this was helpful
Answer:
SANDHILL CO.
Income Statement
For the Year Ended April 30, 2022
<u>Revenues</u>
Sales revenue $6,200
<u>Expenses</u>
Cost of Goods Sold $1,000
Depreciation expense $315
Income tax expense $175
Insurance expense $360
Interest expense $460
Salaries & Wages expenses <u>$850</u>
Total Expenses <u>$3,160</u>
Net Income <u>$3,040</u>
<u />
SANDHILL CO.
Retained Earnings Statement
For the Year Ended April 30, 2022
Retained Earnings, May 1, 2021 $1,700
Add: Net Income <u>$3,040</u> $4,740
Less: Dividends <u>$310 </u>
Retained Earnings, April 30, 2022 <u>$4,430</u>
Answer:
$50,875
Explanation:
The computation of the present value is shown below:
Given that
NPER = 5 × 2 = 10
RATE = 10% ÷ 2 = 5%
PMt = $0
FV = $82,870
The formula is shown below:
= -PV(RATE;NPER;PMT;FV;TYPE)
After applying the above formula, the present value is $50,875
Hence, the present value is $50,875
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
Answer:
Common stock dividend distributable = Par * Number of shares * % dividend
= 13 * 46,500 * 15%
= $90,675
Stock Dividend = Number of shares * market price * % dividend
= 46,500 * 18 * 15%
= $125,550
Date Account Title Debit Credit
Dec, 1 Stock Dividend $125,550
Common Stock Dividend Distributable $90,675
Paid in Capital in excess of Par- $34,875
Common stock
Date Account Title Debit Credit
Dec, 31 Common Stock Dividend Distributable $90,675
Common Stock $90,675
