Answer:
See the explanation below.
Explanation:
The court likely to rule in favor of Ewing.
The reason is that the enough consideration that gives backing to a promise in this case is generally the waiver of a legal right to eat to obesity as requested by the other party.
The evidence that Ewing has lost 154 pounds in weight over the stipulated period is a consideration that sufficient enough under the law. The payment of $10 pound that Ewing has lost is a promise. The fact that Ewing also benefit from the weight loss does not matter.
Answer:
Municipal bond fund
Explanation:
He should be most concerned about this fund because these investments are in the investors IRA, the investment aadviser should be immediately concerned about the municipal bond fund investment.
We have seen that this is a tax deferred account, so a tax free investment is not going to be suitable.
Answer:
$5.74
Explanation:
Q* = 2DS / H[1-(d/p)]
Q² = 2DS / H[1-(d/p)]
S = (Q²)(H)[1 - (d/p) / 2D
Setup cost S = (200^2)*(10)*(1 - (100/800)) / 2*30,500
Setup cost S = 40000*10*0.875 / 61000
Setup cost S = 350000 / 61000
Setup cost S = 5.737704918032787
Setup cost S = $5.74
It is because he is paying money so it is a expense
NASTY AND ALSO THE GUY THE ANSWERED IS NOW BANNED HAHAHA
