Answer:
B. S and I drop by $0.60 trillion.
Explanation:
We know that
Y = C + I + G
$12 trillion = $8 trillion + I + $2 trillion
$12 trillion = $10 trillion + I
So, I = $12 trillion - $10 trillion
= $2 trillion
As the government purchases increase from $2 trillion to $2.60 trillion
and the rest of the things remain the same.
So New I = $12 trillion - $8 trillion - $2.60 trillion
= $1.4 trillion
So, the difference would be equals to
= $2 trillion - $1.4 trillion
= $0.6 trillion
The $0.6 trillion reflect fall in the investment
And the saving and the investment are equal to each other
Hence, the B option is the right answer
<span>Except in extreme cases, the evaluation of success or failure is subjective because time and cost to complete the project are estimates.
Things can go "wrong" or "right" in someones mind even if the overall project is going smoothly. Since project completion times are typically estimates, success is going to be subjective. In designing a new product, until that project launches and is deemed a success or failure, it's hard to classify it. </span>
<span>This statement is true. Since it is impossible to eliminate all spontaneity in life, planning for every little thing is just not viable. There will always be an issue that pops up, which will only create more stress if not planned for. So, yes, too much planning on the job can get in the way of truly enjoying it.</span>
Answer:
A. Profit-seeking multinational companies shift their production from countries with strong environmental standards to countries with weak standards, thus reducing their costs and increasing their profits.
D. self-sufficiency argument.
Explanation:
In the case when there is a race to the bottom scenario so it would be described that the multinational companies that are profit seeking is shifting their production from that countries who have the strong environmental standards to the weak standard countries so that the order would be decreased due to this the profit would increase
In the other case, when the nation is not too much depend on other countries for supplies so this case we called as self-sufficiency argument as they managed themselves rather depending on another
Answer:
1.23
Explanation:
Inventory turnover is a ratio showing how many times a company has sold and replaced inventory during a given period.
Cost of Sales=Opening Inventory+Purchases-Closing Inventory
=5,500+4,000-3,800= 5,700
Average Inventory= Opening + Closing/2
= 5,500+3,800/2= 4,650
Inventory Turnover Ratio= <u>Cost of Sales</u>
Avg Inventory
= 5,700/4,650=1.23
