Answer:
C) They saw slavery as a “positive good” for enslaved workers.
Explanation:
White Southerners safeguarded the foundation of slavery on various fronts. They said that it was important and they said that it was not taboo, yet they likewise contended that it was a positive good. Southerners contended that slavery was a financial need. They contended that there was no real way to get anybody to do the kind of work that was required for tobacco (and later cotton) development without pressuring them. They contended that subjection was in this way totally fundamental for the Southern economy.
The Southerners additionally contended that there was no motivation to believe that slavery was indecent. They looked to somewhere around three sources to help this case. In the first place, they looked to Biblical times. They noted that there was slavery in the Old Testament and the New Testament and that Jesus never opposed the practice. Second, they took a gander at classical antiquity. They contended that the Greeks and the Romans had slaves even as they were the wellspring of Western development. At last, they took a gander at the time of the Founding Fathers. They noticed that the general population who composed the Constitution had slaves. In view of these precedents, they contended that there was no motivation to think slavery wasn't right.
Answer:
She should be prosecuted
Explanation:
In order to convict a defendant of malicious destruction of property, the Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:
The defendant destroyed or damaged the personal property, building, or dwelling house of another person;
The defendant did so willfully; and.
The defendant acted with malice.
I copied this online, so don't copy, but this shows why you could convict Tracy of the crime. She destroyed people's personal property, their phones, which she did willfully. This goes to show why she should be prosecuted and charged. Thanks, and I hope this helps! BRAINLIEST PLEASE!
Answer:
<h2>a, the use of trench warfare</h2>
Trench warfare in World War I meant that the armies dug into trenches to hold their ground. But it proved impossible for them to make any advances against each other. If they would try to mount an attack, venturing into "no man's land" between the trenches, they'd get mowed down by machine gun fire. In addition to bullets and artillery fire, trench warfare also came to involve the use of chemical weapons like mustard gas. Trench warfare in World War I was miserable and gruesome.
Answer:
like a king
Explanation:
sorry i dont actually know the answer-
The Enforcement Acts were three bills passed by the United States Congress between 1870 and 1871. They were criminal codes which protected African-Americans' right to vote, to hold office, to serve on juries, and receive equal protection of laws.
I looked your question up and copied and pasted the answers. I’m not 100% sure that it’s right.
