This is a matter of opinion.
If you think yes, you could argue that internment was a great PR move and/or that it protected the Japanese living in America from negative press
If you argue no (which I would) then you could argue that it was unconstitutional and/or had no strategic importance to the war itself.
I think Memphis, I may be wrong.
Answer:
A: People surrender some of their natural rights in exchange for the common good.
Explanation:
In both Locke and Rousseau's social contract theories, the main idea was that the people would surrender some of their freedoms to the government, in exchange for a fair government system and society.
The government would protect society for the common good and the people would surrender some of their freedoms for this system to work.
Mr. crabtree was 22 years old. i just took a test on it
