1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
n200080 [17]
3 years ago
15

although it seemed quite important in 1788 amendment barring the quartering of solidiers in private homes is outdated today

Law
1 answer:
rodikova [14]3 years ago
7 0

Although it seemed quite important in 1788 amendment III, barring the quartering of soldiers in private homes is outdated today.

Explanation:

The Amendment III of the United States constitution states that none of the soldiers in time of peace can be quartered in any private homes without owners consent. Its main intention was to protect citizen's rights to their own property without the government's violation.

The practice was forbidden in peacetime and the British army was allowed to lodge in private residences.

James Madison introduced the third amendment in congress in the year 1789. This amendment was a part of the bill of rights of the United States.

You might be interested in
Why do people find it that they have to have viloence in their lives
Kitty [74]
Maybe they have suffered when they were a young child, and the past became who he is now.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
• Name and explain TWO laws/legislation that protect citizens against human trafficking<br>​
lora16 [44]
The act of 2000 and the Reauthorization Act of 2003-2005.
7 0
3 years ago
7. Which type of search requires a warrant? (1 point)
KiRa [710]

Answer:

House search

Explanation:

The Fourth Amendment requires a warrant be based on probable cause, and must describe the persons and places to be searched as well as the items to be seized. A judicial warrant (often called a criminal warrant) is used by police to search a person or place for evidence of a crime.

5 0
3 years ago
Is the Supreme Courts interpretation of the 14th Amendment and use of selective incorporation a
hram777 [196]

Answer and Explanation:

The 14th amendment cannot be a violation of the concept of federalism, as federalism is in accordance with the concepts covered in the Bill of Rights and only allows for the separation and sharing of powers between state and federal governments if this does not hurt the concepts covered by the Bill of Rights. These concepts are strengthened with the 14th amendment and for this reason, we should not consider that this amendment could harm the concept of federalism.

The ability of a state to create its own laws must be maintained even if people can move from one state to another, because this allows states to organize and maintain order in their territories, independent of their inhabitants. In this case, the individual who is moving from state to state must adapt to the laws of the territory, so that he/she can remain in the place.

7 0
2 years ago
What are two common strategies that interest groups use to shape public
erica [24]

Answer:

PACs

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In some states, including Texas, these prevent a journalist from being forced to reveal a confidential source. *
    12·1 answer
  • If the president dies, or is removed from office the vice president will become president, knowing that a president can only ser
    9·1 answer
  • Articles of confederation created a week central government which led to the creation of which document?
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT a key economic question?
    5·1 answer
  • What will happen to you if you break the law in north korea?
    12·1 answer
  • 15 POINTS &amp; BRAINLIEST!!!
    10·1 answer
  • X
    12·1 answer
  • The
    14·1 answer
  • In this course, glossary terms are
    7·1 answer
  • How does the media expose human rights violation​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!