although it seemed quite important in 1788 amendment barring the quartering of solidiers in private homes is outdated today

1 answer:

7 0

Although it seemed quite important in 1788 amendment III, barring the quartering of soldiers in private homes is outdated today.

Explanation:

The Amendment III of the United States constitution states that none of the soldiers in time of peace can be quartered in any private homes without owners consent. Its main intention was to protect citizen's rights to their own property without the government's violation.

The practice was forbidden in peacetime and the British army was allowed to lodge in private residences.

James Madison introduced the third amendment in congress in the year 1789. This amendment was a part of the bill of rights of the United States.

You might be interested in

Trial practice is dramatically different in Britain. The lawyers for the two sides, called solicitors, do not go into court. Cou

Burka [1]

Answer:

The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.

Explanation:

The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers. This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions. The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage. With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.

3 0

2 years ago

In a burglary case, investigators have to collect evidence so that they can identify the source of the shattered pieces of glass

Sedaia [141]

I think it’s B but I’m not sure if it’s correct tho

6 0

3 years ago

If I were to barely touch some one and they push me down how do there parents get to press charges?

Ivanshal [37]

At that point I will beat em up

4 0

2 years ago