Answer:
concurring
Explanation:
a concurring opinion is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different or additional reasons as the basis for their decision.
The answer is true because without the constitution no branch of the gov would have power actually
Hello. You forgot to enter the answer options. The options are:
A. Most of the executives were secretly blue-collar workers.
B. Companies were careful never to violate American law.
C. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was unintentional.
D. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was intentional.
Answer:
D. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was intentional.
Explanation:
Edwin Sutherland was surprised to discover scenes of corruption and violation of laws within American industries. He was even more surprised when he discovered that these violations were done intensionally, promoting the benefit of entrepreneurs who had no commitment to order and honesty. These crimes are known as White Collar and are made by people who already live a wealthy life and without economic difficulties.
Answer:
El racismo es la creencia de que grupos de humanos poseen diferentes rasgos de comportamiento correspondientes a atributos heredados y pueden dividirse en función de la superioridad de una raza sobre otra.
As a result of LaShonda being assaulted while visiting the Six Flags in Georgia, the venue of the criminal case would be <u>Georgia</u>.
<h3>Why would the venue be Georgia?</h3>
The original venue of a criminal case that did not cross state lines would be the state in which the crime was committed.
Even though LaShonda is a resident of Wisconsin, the crime was committed in Georgia which means that the venue would be Georgia.
Find out more on original venues at brainly.com/question/342388.
