1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
k0ka [10]
3 years ago
11

How were the Romans able to move from wooden houses to more permanent structures?

History
1 answer:
astra-53 [7]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options provided, we can say the following.

Romans were able to move from wooden houses to more permanent structures because they started to experiment with the use of concrete, cement, and better formulas to increase the quality of this material. Romans were also capable of exploring new ideas to create forms such as vaults and arches. Let's have in mind that Romans originally used a different material called "tufa" which was a volcanic rock. A solid material but not an aesthetical one. Years later, Romans cold mix concrete with volcanic sand to create a more resistant material. With the use of marble, Romans were capable of creating marvelous buildings and temples.

You might be interested in
What was the consequence of the great rebellion
kirill115 [55]

both sides sufferd plus inocent people died due to the empire

hope this helps

~~apple

8 0
3 years ago
Pa help Po kailangan ko lang​
kykrilka [37]

Answer:

Hgvbbbbbbbgssfhuhgg yang telah berpartisipasi

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was unintended, negative consequence of the green Revolution
Assoli18 [71]
<span>B. use of artificial fertilizers have on the environment in many years
</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why would Samuel Morse’s invention been impossible before 1831?
IrinaVladis [17]

Answer:

Developed in the 1830s and 1840s by Samuel Morse (1791-1872) and other inventors, the telegraph revolutionized long-distance communication. It worked by transmitting electrical signals over a wire laid between stations.

5 0
3 years ago
What differences do you notice between how the Spanish, French, and British viewed and treated Native Americans?
ipn [44]

Answer:

The major difference between the way that the Spanish and the French treated "their" Indians was based on the respective economic and societal needs of the two European nations. The French used the Indians as economic partners, but did not really try to integrate them that much into a colonial society.

Explanation:

I hope this helps some how sorry if it doesn't

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Look at these four advertisements from the 1920s. For each one, analyze the target audience, the kind of persuasive influence it
    6·1 answer
  • The main reason wd-40 is in 75 percent of all u.s. households seems to be:
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the statements below best describes the state of the Union's economic infrastructure during the Civil War?
    6·2 answers
  • What did the Guano Islands Acts allow the United States to do?
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes Kennedy’s response to the building of the Berlin Wall?
    15·2 answers
  • Will give brainliest please answer!!!!
    5·1 answer
  • ?? is a political system headed by a dictator that calls for extreme nationalism and often racism with no tolerance of oppositio
    11·1 answer
  • Do the ratios 14:12 and 7:6 form a proportion? YES OR NO?
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HURRY 100 POINTS: What column title for the information on the right is the best for this characteristics chart?
    12·2 answers
  • What factors limited texas's exposure to the ravages of the civil war?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!