1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
choli [55]
4 years ago
12

which of the following statements describes rational use of national forests? A.only large businesses should be allowed to harve

st trees in national forests. B. there should be no restrictions on the land. C.national forests should be protected to make the best use of the nation's natural resources. D. national forests should ban lumbering completely.
History
1 answer:
sertanlavr [38]4 years ago
5 0
There should be some limit on lumbering: without a limit it is likely that too much wood would be cut  and that the forest would  die.

On the other hand, a complete ban is too radical: in some cases some limited lumbering might make sense (even to help neighboring trees flourish).

The best answer is C.national forests should be protected to make the best use of the nation's natural resources.
You might be interested in
How did the American Revolution inspire the French Revolution?
tangare [24]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does nicholas novikov describe United states
irakobra [83]
He describes how the country is planning world domination he flet that us had the upper hand which caused the civil war etc
7 0
3 years ago
After Saddam Hussein’s forces were defeated in Iraq and driven from Kuwait, US and Allied leaders had a decision to make. Saddam
maxonik [38]

Answer:

What arguments could be made for removing the dictator?

Arguments for removing the dictator are: allowing the country to establish a democracy. Helping out or improving the situation of those demographic groups that were oppressed by the dictator. Another argument is simply punishing the dictator for his crimes.

What arguments could be made for keeping the dictator in power?

The main argument for keeping the dictator is to ensure the stability of the country, even if such stability is unfair at many times, and comes along with the oppresion of certain social and political groups.

Another argument is simply to prevent the country from getting worse.

A final argument is pragmatic: keeping the dictator in power might serve everyone's interests better. Democratic countries have frequently established ties with authoritarian governments.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who said This is the mother country, they are the c hildren; they must obey, and we prescribe.
fenix001 [56]
Hello,




<span>The British are making acts about the taxes</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Put the events in the space race in the order they happened
Kaylis [27]

Answer:

Sputnik 1 was launched, NASA was founded, Yuri Gagarin went into space, John Glenn orbited Earth, Neil Armstrong walked on moon.

Explanation:

Edge nuity

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What does the term natural increase mean in describing a population
    14·1 answer
  • Public Domain
    12·2 answers
  • What was one reason why many white Southerners opposed Reconstruction? They felt Northerners were getting rich at their expense.
    14·2 answers
  • Which example bestillustrates how the Constitution reflects the principle of
    15·1 answer
  • What made the establishment of Black Colleges possible
    7·1 answer
  • Why did the british raise taxes in the american colonies how did colonists react?
    6·1 answer
  • A Blank is a prediction based on data and information you researched
    8·1 answer
  • What social changes were brought about in America during WWI?
    10·1 answer
  • Bob bought the 24 fish for $51.36
    12·1 answer
  • During the colonial period, commodities that could only be exported legally to britain were known as _______.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!