Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
This scenario can be modeled using an exponential growth equation.
The exponential growth equations have the following form:
Where P is the population in year t
p is the initial population at t = 0
r is the growth rate
t is the time in years.
In this case we know that the current population is 13,000 and that the growth rate is 11%
So
The equation that models this scenario is:
Carlos is correct
Since we don't know the length of sides PR and XZ, the triangles can't be congruent by the SSS theorem or the SAS theorem, and since we don't know the measure of angles Y and Q, the triangles can't be congruent by the ASA theorem, the SAS theorem or the AAS theorem. Therefore, Carlos is correct.
Carlos is correct. Since the angles P and X are not included between PQ and RQ and XY and YZ, the SAS postulate cannot be used, since it states that the angle must be included between the sides. Unlike with ASA, where there is the AAS theorem for non-included sides, there is not SSA theorem for non-included angles, so the triangles cannot be proven to be congruent.
I can't see the image clear enough!
Answer:
3(x + 8)
Step-by-step explanation:
"The product of three and the sum of a number and eight".
First, note that:
1) Product means multiply.
2) Sum means addition.
With that in mind, also note the order of operations. The order of operations is defined as PEMDAS, or:
Parenthesis
Exponents (& Roots)
Multiplication
Division
Addition
Subtraction
Also, let "a number" be denoted as the variable, x.
~
Firstly, "the sum of a number and eight": x + 8
Next, "The product of...": 3 *
Putting the two parts together will generate: 3(x + 8)
3(x + 8) is your answer.
~
