Considering the situation described in the question, the phrase that exemplified the situation is "disparate impact."
This is because the disparate impact is a phenomenon or situation that occurs when some policies or decisions are made in a neutral sense.
However, the effect of such policy appears to affect a certain set of people, thereby appearing as if it is discrimination.
In other words, a disparate impact is a form of unintentional discrimination that is originally established as impartial policies or regulations that are made generally but whose effects appear to affect a certain set of people.
In this case, the policy made by Sentinals FC on hiring new players affects a certain set of people.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "disparate impact."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/20510564
Answer:
Every business has a moral duty to be a good corporate citizen.
Explanation:
Businesses are formed to make profit, and this is the primary goal of businesses. So when making a business case for a company to act in a socially responsible manner, the benefit to the business as profits is the primary consideration.
If it is argued that every business has a moral duty to be a good corporate citizen, it does not translate to profits or benefit for the company.
So this is a weak argument when a business case is being created for why businesses should act in a socially responsible manner.
The systematic risk principle states that the expected return on a risky asset depends only on the asset’s <u>market </u>risk.
<h3>What are
systematic risk principles?</h3>
According to the systemic risk concept, the expected return on an asset is solely determined by its systematic risk. As a result, regardless of how much overall risk an asset carries, just the systematic part is significant in estimating the expected return (including risk premium) on such asset.
Market risk is a kind of systematic risk that affects the entire market. Because it cannot be diversified and distributed, the investor is compensated for it.
Learn more about systematic risk principles here:
brainly.com/question/25821437
#SPJ1
Learn more about systematic risk principles here:
Answer: are higher than average, because the job sector is rapidly growing.
Explanation: More and more people are using technology by the percentage so it goes up often
This is the option out of all that make sense, and i just took the test and it is correct.
Lena makes $45 profit.
Extra information:
The amount of profit Lena makes is 3/4th of the profit Joe makes, seeing as when Joe makes $4 profit, Lena makes $3 and $3 is 3/4th of $4. Therefore, when Joe makes a profit of $60, Lena makes a profit of (60 x 3/4) $45.
