She decides to purchase the beats brand because she believes it’s a higher quality set. In this case, alicia has been influenced by the Informative effect of price.
<h3>
Information effect of price.</h3>
Consumers tend to use the information about the price of a product to ascertain its Quality. The is basically because the perception of quality is usually indicated by price.
Here, Alicia buying the beats brand even thogh it costs higher than the skullcandy model shows that she is using the information effect of price making her to perceive the beats brand as having higher quality.
Learn more on Information effect of price: brainly.com/question/7930369
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": Conjoint analysis.
Explanation:
In Marketing, Conjoint analysis or Conjoint Value Analysis (CVA) is a research helpful in determining how individuals value different features of the same product. The analysis aims to measure the utility that consumers perceive from each feature at different levels of the product.
Answer:
Allocated salary to Grinding = $18,000
Explanation:
<em>The Salary would be allocated between the department using the number f employees as the basis of allocation. This is so because number of employees would be a reasonable factory that influences the amount incurred as salary expense.</em>
This is done as follows:
Allocated Salary expense =
Number of employee in a department/Total employee× Salary
Allocated salary to Grinding Department
= 1500/2500× $30,000=$18,000
Allocated salary to Grinding = $18,000
Answer:
The correct answer is C.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The down payment of $5,000 and financed the balance. According to the purchase agreement, you must pay $600/month for four years, beginning one month from today. The credit agreement is based on an annual interest rate of 12%.
First, we need to calculate the final value of the monthly payment.
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual deposit= 600
i= 0.12/12= 0.01
n= 12*4= 48
FV= {600*[(1.01^48)-1]}/0.01= 36,733.56
Now, we calculate the present value:
PV= FV/ (1+i)^n= 36,733.56/ (1.01^48)= 22,784
Total cost= 22,784 + 5,000= $27,784
Answer:
Comparability of Financial Statements in different jurisdictions
Explanation:
The reason is that if the IFRC is successful in achieving this then it will help the investor to make more informed decisions and gain maximum out of the investment and all this is only possible by enhanced comparability of the financial statements in different jurisdictions.
