1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Damm [24]
3 years ago
11

Most Southerners saw the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 as detrimental to the interest

History
1 answer:
GarryVolchara [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

In the  White House.

Explanation:

Republican Abraham Lincoln was a well-known supporter of the abolition of slavery. His predecessor, James Buchanan, tried to appease the southern states and made political concessions to them in order to preserve the unity of the Union. But the election of Lincoln in 1860 was too much for many slavery states, they could not diggest his becoming the next USA president, and some states seceded even before he was sworn in.

You might be interested in
Select all that apply. Some of the characteristics that all civilizations share are: the ability to specialize in one job the ne
finlep [7]

Answer:

1. the ability to specialize in one job

2. practicing religion

3. political organization

Explanation:

Civilization is a form of human society or development in which the people in a given society at a given period associate with themselves and build a complex cultural phenomenon.

Some of the characteristics of civilization include the following:

1. the ability to specialize in one job

2. practicing religion

3. political organization.

8 0
3 years ago
Describe the problem created by the European nations when they divided Africa.
SVEN [57.7K]
They didn't consider they people, religion, or ethic groups in the decision to divide them.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLZ HURRY
german
ANSWER: C. Playing sports
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What events contributed to the rise and fall of the Egyptian empire
guajiro [1.7K]
The Egyptians failed to adapt to the new changes of their world. There are multiple books on this and it is very interesting.
6 0
3 years ago
How were Simon bolivar and Jose de San Martin similar
Butoxors [25]

José de San Martín vs. Simón Bolívar

José de San Martín, 1778-1850, and Simon Bolívar, 1783-1830, were two of the primary causes of independence of countries from colonial powers in Latin America. Simon Bolívar is primarily known for liberating Venezuela, and he is called the Liberator of the North. José de San Martín, known as the Liberator of the South, is primarily known for freeing Argentina. Both men are well-known and lived during about the same time period and even met each other. However, their areas of liberation, methods of liberation and motives were very different from each other.

Bolívar and Martín differed in areas of jurisdiction – Venezuela and Argentina, respectively, as well as methods and means of revolution. Bolívar was 26 years old when Venezuela declared its independence in 1811, and under the revolutionary leader he brought back Francisco de Miranda, who had long advocated freedom from the Spanish rule Venezuela was once under, to become Venezuela’s leader. However, after an erratic and unsuccessful leadership, Bolívar captured Miranda (after his rebel army was stopped) and betrayed him by turning over to the Spanish, but the Spanish only sent Bolívar into exile (unlike Miranda, who they imprisoned). After returning from exile, Bolívar taught creoles that they could rebel successfully against 3 decades of Spanish rule, but was then drove out by the Spaniards. After being chased out of Venezuela three more times, while using terror tactics the Spanish had once used against Creoles such as suffocation, while gaining the support of the British and a bond with Haiti, and while declaring that he would abolish slavery as his first official act (if in power), he decided to build a guerilla warfare army in 1817. After defeating the Spanish in New Granada (which consisted of present-day Columbia, Ecuador, Venezuela, and Panama) using guerilla tactics and the help of thousands of mercenaries from Britain and Germany, he met with San Martín and desired to take advantage of Spain’s falling empire (due to political disagreements and an army revolt), but did not collaborate with him on a major scale. Bolívar formed a series of nations called “Grand Columbia” out of New Granada from which he intended to make a “model of strength and aggression from outside and of cooperation inside”, however, this unification soon disbanded itself (Adams, 33). Bolívar’s last battle ended in splendor in 1823, as it was entirely between cavalry with swords and lances.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did people think it was ok to have slaves?
    12·1 answer
  • Why did countries with monarchies fight the french
    10·1 answer
  • Where in north america did champlain explore
    13·2 answers
  • One example of political change that took place in industrialized nations was?
    15·2 answers
  • Which power are shared between federal and state government? Example? Why?
    15·1 answer
  • Which added to severe us economic problems in 1971
    14·2 answers
  • Pleaseeee helppp me!!! I will give brainliest to whoever answers correctly and first!! Please I'm desperate!
    9·2 answers
  • 4 Which of the following countries has
    12·1 answer
  • The abundance of what natural resource
    6·1 answer
  • What was [is] Fundamentalism? How and why did it emerge? What are the best examples of its influence in the 1920s? (100-150 word
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!