Answer:
The commensal relationship between the sharks and remoras can be described as although remoras consume parasites, sharks with remoras show no better health or growth than sharks without remoras.
Explanation:
A commensal relationship refers to a relationship where two or more organisms in a habitat neither benefit or harm each other.
- The second option infers that the remoras harm the sharks. This is a parasitic relationship.
- The third option infers that the sharks are harmed by the remoras because the sharks depend on something that the remoras are limiting. This is also a parasitic relationship.
- The fourth option infers a commensal relationship, but falsely describes it. The relationship described by this option is a parasitic relationship (one benefits, the other does not).
Therefore, the answer is the first option: Although remoras consume parasites, sharks with remoras show no better health or growth than sharks without remoras.
The brain contains
billions of interconnected neurons and glia. <span> Glia cells</span><span> enclosed the neurons and provide support for and insulation
between them. It is also the most abundant </span>cell types in the
central nervous system. While Neurons are the basic units of the nervous system and it is the
most important part is the brain.
<span> </span>
A. the mitochondria and chloroplasts are much different in structure than bacteria
60*1.609=96.5606 km/hr
that’s the only one i know bc you didn’t include an image for the steam train...atleast i can’t see it
<span>What is the most likely effect that a war might have a food security?
A. Crops would be burned and convoys attacked to deny food sources to the enemy
During war time, everything is done to ensure victory. Food and water of the enemies are either confiscated or burned down. Enemies will be starving and dehydrated making them susceptible to sickness or death. Decreasing there numbers and making it easier to defeat them in battle. </span>
