Which of the following statements does not describe an effect of Indian removal on the Osage?

History

2 answers:

salantis [7]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Explanation:

2020 edge

goblinko [34]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Indian Removal was an act enacted President Andrew Jackson, on May 28, 1830 into the law. According to this act, Native Americans were forced to leave their ancestral lands and move to the western parts of Mississippi river.

It was a forced migraton of Indians by the US government. This act forced the tribes either to accept US newly enforced law or to leave their homes.

The Indian Removal act did not effect Osage as they were not forced out of their lands, instead they agreed to renounce their lands in exchange of reserved lands in Oklahoma. This decision ultimately made them the wealthiest Native Americans.

Thus the correct option is A.

You might be interested in

Type the correct answer in the box.

Butoxors [25]

Answer:

monsoon rains

Explanation:

In the winter, they are in the northwest. In the summer, they are in the southeast

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Second-most powerful member of the House

Delvig [45]

Answer:

D) vice president is the 2nd most powerful

4 0

3 years ago

Hat was the result of the Supreme Court ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden?

diamong [38]

The main result of the Supreme Court ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden was that "The Court defined interstate commerce and declared federal law supreme over state law," since the ruling was that the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce applied to navigation as well.

3 0

3 years ago

The indian leader that advocated a peaceful attempt at independence was

victus00 [196]

Subhash Chandra Bose

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Close to market pastures were rented for? (OK History)

Amanda [17]

Answer:

okay??????????????????????/