1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
elena55 [62]
3 years ago
8

Which of the following statements does not describe an effect of Indian removal on the Osage?

History
2 answers:
salantis [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A

Explanation:

2020 edge

goblinko [34]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

Indian Removal was an act enacted President Andrew Jackson, on May 28, 1830 into the law. According to this act, Native Americans were forced to leave their ancestral lands and move to the western parts of Mississippi river.

It was a forced migraton of Indians by the US government. This act forced the tribes either to accept US newly enforced law or to leave their homes.

<u>The Indian Removal act did not effect Osage as they were not forced out of their lands, </u><u>instead they agreed to renounce their lands in exchange of reserved lands in Oklahoma</u><u>. </u><em><u>This decision ultimately made them the wealthiest Native Americans</u></em><u>.</u>

Thus the correct option is A.

You might be interested in
How did the battle of Gettysburg affect European governments ​
lions [1.4K]

Answer:They withdrew their support from the Confederacy. They refused to recognize the Confederacy as independent. They refused to help in peace talks with the Union.

Explanation:on

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the first Immigration Law In the United States in 1882?
algol13

Answer:

The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882

Explanation:

The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. This law suspended immigration of Chinese laborers.

6 0
3 years ago
Many people in the United States and Europe held protests related to the Rosenbergs’ trial because they thought that the Rosenbe
Tomtit [17]

Answer:

They held protests related to the Rosenbergs' trial because they thought that the Rosenbergs had not been given a fair, impartial trial.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What says that the constitution supersedes all state and local laws ?
Morgarella [4.7K]

The people, they protested like we do today. They basically said, "We don't want to abide to your rules anymore king George"

Hope this helps!

3 0
3 years ago
St.John first introduced Christianity to the Greeks of Corinth.<br><br> True or false?
KengaRu [80]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • in the late 1800s what factor most contributed to the successful implementation of the practices of vertical and horizontal inte
    11·1 answer
  • Who is Jacob in the Bible?
    7·1 answer
  • IN THE 1900 HOW WERE THE US SENATE CHOSEN
    13·1 answer
  • What was the name given to the World War I veterans who asked government for an early war-related payment?
    9·1 answer
  • Durning the new kingdom, Egypt became ___.
    9·1 answer
  • is it haram to drink water during Ramadan? if so explain where did you get that answer and from which sheikh
    14·2 answers
  • What is 6^2<br><br> i am so unsmart
    5·2 answers
  • Can plains Indian and whites have a peaceful coexisted? Yes or no, explain.
    9·1 answer
  • What led to the storming of the Bastille, and therefore, to the start of the French Revolution?
    7·2 answers
  • Plz help me how can you delete the question
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!