Answer:
1. Cash (Dr.) $2,000
Common Stock (Cr.) $2,000
2. Accounts Receivable (Dr.) $1,500
Revenue (Cr.) $1,500
3. Cash (Dr.) $1,200
Accounts Receivable (Cr.) $1,200
4. Salaries expense accrued (Dr.) $900
Salaries payable (Cr.) $900
5. Salary Payable (Dr.) $700
Cash (Cr.) $700
6. Dividends paid (Dr.) $100
Cash (Cr.) $100
7.Prepaid Insurance (Dr.) $360
Cash (Cr.) $360
8. Cash (Dr.) $2,880
Unearned revenue (Cr.) $2,880
9. Insurance Expense (Dr.) $290
Prepaid Insurance (Cr.) $290
10. Unearned revenue (Dr.) $2,880
Revenue (Cr.) $2,880.
Explanation:
Smith company has started its business and incurred the transactions. These transactions need to be recorded to charge each and every expense in their respective accounts. The expenses are recorded in the journal entries and then ledger accounts will be formed to summaries all the expenses in their respective account heads.
A business operated by state legally...... is called corporation
Answer:
Net income for the year = $257,000
Explanation:
Retained earnings for the year= Net income - dividends paid.
Since no dividends were paid, retained earnings for the year = net income for the year. At the end of each accounting period, retained earnings are reported on the balance sheet, and the retained profits for the year are added to the beginning balance of retained earnings, to give a cumulative ending balance of $2,499,000.
therefore retained earnings for the year = ending retained earnings balance - beginning retained earnings balance = $2,499,000.-$2,242,000= $257,000.
Net income for the year is thus = $257,000 since no dividends were paid.
First, the value of each share rose by 2. So we have +2.
Then it fell by 5. So we have
2 - 5 = -3
Each share has a net value of negative 3.
Dave owns 15 shares. So,
15 * (-3) = -45.
So, there is a net loss of $45.
The court found the employee status because he had and agreement indicating that he was an independent <em>contractor</em>.
<h3>What is an independent contractor?</h3>
It should be noted independent contractors are the contractors that don't work under an employer. They work independently.
In this case, the court found the employee status because he had and agreement indicating that he was an independent contractor.
Learn more about independent contractor on:
brainly.com/question/7429981
#SPJ1
