Answer:
Until relatively recently, tort was one of the areas on Corporate and Business Law that caused candidates the most difficulty. In recent sessions, the tort answers have tended to be stronger, but there is also evidence of some confusion between tort and contract, with negligence-based material frequently arising in answers to contract questions.
Answer:
what do you mean ............
Explanation:
because I'm just askin
A law clerk or judicial clerk is a person—usually an attorney—who assists and counsels a judge in making legal decisions and writing opinions by studying problems before the court.
<h3>What Is the Role of a Judicial Clerk?</h3>
There is no such thing as a concise job description for a judicial clerk, and the specific responsibilities of a clerk vary depending on the type of court in which the clerk works and the judge's preferences.
The judicial clerk is a full-time assistant to the judge who typically handles a variety of activities such as legal research, drafting of memoranda and court opinions, proofreading, and citation checking.
A judicial clerk is frequently responsible for different administrative activities such as docket and library upkeep, document assembly, and other administrative tasks required to meet the judge's many obligations.
Thus, Option D is correct.
For more information about Judicial Clerk refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/26488958
The penalty could include death or imprisonment for a minimum of five years.
Because the framers of the United States Constitution (written in 1787) believed that protecting property rights relating to inventions would encourage the new nation’s economic growth, they gave Congress—the national legislature—a constitutional mandate to grant patents for inventions. The resulting patent system has served as a model for those in other nations. Recently, however, scholars have questioned whether the American system helped achieve the framers’ goals. These scholars have contended that from 1794 to roughly 1830, American inventors were unable to enforce property rights because judges were “anticipate” and routinely invalidated patents for arbitrary reasons. This argument is based partly on examination of court decisions in cases where patent holders (“patentees”) brought suit alleging infringement of their patent rights. In the 1820s, for instance, 75 percent of verdicts were decided against the patentee. The proportion of verdicts for the patentee began to increase in the 1830s, suggesting to these scholars that judicial attitudes toward patent rights began shifting then.
To learn more about protecting property rights visit here ; brainly.com/question/28388414?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
